Advanced Ecodesign, 6 credits
Avancerad miljödriven produktutveckling, 6 hp
TKMJ46
Main field of study
Product Development Mechanical EngineeringCourse level
Second cycleCourse type
Programme courseExaminer
Johannes MatschewskyDirector of studies or equivalent
Marianna Lena KambanouEducation components
Preliminary scheduled hours: 51 hRecommended self-study hours: 109 h
Available for exchange students
YesCourse offered for | Semester | Period | Timetable module | Language | Campus | ECV | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6CDPU | Design and Product Development, Master of Science in Engineering | 9 (Autumn 2026) | 1 | 4 | Swedish/English | Linköping, Valla | E |
6CDPU | Design and Product Development, Master of Science in Engineering (Product Development - Design Engineering) | 9 (Autumn 2026) | 1 | 4 | Swedish/English | Linköping, Valla | E |
6MSUS | Sustainability Engineering and Management, Master's Programme | 3 (Autumn 2026) | 1 | 4 | Swedish/English | Linköping, Valla | E |
Main field of study
Product Development, Mechanical EngineeringCourse level
Second cycleAdvancement level
A1FCourse offered for
- Master of Science in Design and Product Development
- Master's Programme in Sustainability Engineering and Management
Prerequisites
General technical knowledge from three years of study at a technical university. Environmental Engineering, Resource-efficient productsIntended learning outcomes
The student should after the course:
- Have detailed knowledge of and practice in life cycle assessment methodology, and individual be able to apply the method.
- Analyze and depending on the need, choose appropriate methods / tools for ecodesign.
- Understand and describe the relevant international environmental related product legislations, such as WEEE, RoHS, ELV, and EuP.
- Understand and describe international standards on ecodesign, such as ISO 14 006 and ISO 14064 and eco-labels (Type 1-3).
- Have detailed knowledge of, how to implementing ecodesign strategies and a handful of ecodesign methods / tools. At least one of these ecodesign methods / tools must be customer and value based.
- Be able to utilize life-cycle methodology and at least one more ecodesign method / tool on a product, this in order to identify, analyze and reduce the environmental impact of the product.
Course content
In-depth knowledge of and practice in life cycle assessment methodology. Choice of ecodesign methods / tools. International environmental related product legislation such as WEEE, RoHS, ELV, EuP. International standards on ecodesign, such as ISO 14 006 and ISO 14064 and eco-labels (Type 1-3). In-depth knowledge of ecodesign strategies and ecodesign methods / tools. Seminars on various ecodesign methods / tools. Mandatory project where students conduct a life cycle assessment and, upon approval by the examiner, utilizes another optional ecodesign method / tool on a product, this in order to identify and reduce its environmental impact.
Teaching and working methods
The course is based on lectures, exercises, seminars and project work.
Examination
PRA1 | Project assignment | 1.5 credits | U, G |
DIT1 | Digital examination | 4.5 credits | U, 3, 4, 5 |
Grades
Four-grade scale, LiU, U, 3, 4, 5Other information
About teaching and examination language
The teaching language is presented in the Overview tab for each course. The examination language relates to the teaching language as follows:
- If teaching language is “Swedish”, the course as a whole could be given in Swedish, or partly in English. Examination language is Swedish, but parts of the examination can be in English.
- If teaching language is “English”, the course as a whole is taught in English. Examination language is English.
- If teaching language is “Swedish/English”, the course as a whole will be taught in English if students without prior knowledge of the Swedish language participate. Examination language is Swedish or English depending on teaching language.
Other
The course is conducted in such a way that there are equal opportunities with regard to sex, transgender identity or expression, ethnicity, religion or other belief, disability, sexual orientation and age.
The planning and implementation of a course should correspond to the course syllabus. The course evaluation should therefore be conducted with the course syllabus as a starting point.
The course is campus-based at the location specified for the course, unless otherwise stated under “Teaching and working methods”. Please note, in a campus-based course occasional remote sessions could be included.
Department
Institutionen för ekonomisk och industriell utvecklingCourse literature
Stevels, Ab (2007) Adventures in EcoDesign of Electronic Products Avancerad miljödriven produktutveckling, Litteraturkompendium – en sammanställning av forskningsartiklar.Code | Name | Scope | Grading scale |
---|---|---|---|
PRA1 | Project assignment | 1.5 credits | U, G |
DIT1 | Digital examination | 4.5 credits | U, 3, 4, 5 |
Course syllabus
A syllabus must be established for each course. The syllabus specifies the aim and contents of the course, and the prior knowledge that a student must have in order to be able to benefit from the course.
Timetabling
Program courses are timetabled after a decision has been made for this course concerning its assignment to a timetable module. Single subject courses can be timetabled at other times.
Interruption in and deregistration from a course
The LiU decision, Guidelines concerning confirmation of participation in education, Dnr LiU-2020-02256 (https://styrdokument.liu.se/Regelsamling/VisaBeslut/764582), states that interruptions in study are to be recorded in Ladok. Thus, all students who do not participate in a course for which they have registered are therefore obliged to report the interruption so that this can be noted in Ladok. Deregistration from or interrupting a course is carried out using a Web-based form.
Cancelled courses and changes to the course syllabus
Courses with few participants (fewer than 10) may be cancelled or organised in a manner that differs from that stated in the course syllabus. The Dean is to deliberate and decide whether a course is to be cancelled or changed from the course syllabus. For single subject courses, the cancellation must be done before students are admitted to the course (in accordance with LiUs regulation Dnr LiU-2022-01200, https://styrdokument.liu.se/Regelsamling/VisaBeslut/622645).
Guidelines relating to examinations and examiners
For details, see Guidelines for education and examination for first-cycle and second-cycle education at Linköping University, Dnr LiU-2023-00379 (http://styrdokument.liu.se/Regelsamling/VisaBeslut/917592).
An examiner must be employed as a teacher at LiU according to the LiU Regulations for Appointments, Dnr LiU-2022-04445 (https://styrdokument.liu.se/Regelsamling/VisaBeslut/622784). For courses in second-cycle, the following teachers can be appointed as examiner: Professor (including Adjunct and Visiting Professor), Associate Professor (including Adjunct), Senior Lecturer (including Adjunct and Visiting Senior Lecturer), Research Fellow, or Postdoc. For courses in first-cycle, Assistant Lecturer (including Adjunct and Visiting Assistant Lecturer) can also be appointed as examiner in addition to those listed for second-cycle courses. In exceptional cases, a Part-time Lecturer can also be appointed as an examiner at both first- and second cycle, see Delegation of authority for the Board of Faculty of Science and Engineering.
Forms of examination
Principles for examination
Written and oral examinations and digital and computer-based examinations are held at least three times a year: once immediately after the end of the course, once in August, and once (usually) in one of the re-examination periods. Examinations held at other times are to follow a decision of the faculty programme board.
Principles for examination scheduling for courses that follow the study periods:
- courses given in VT1 are examined for the first time in March, with re-examination in June and August
- courses given in VT2 are examined for the first time in May, with re-examination in August and January
- courses given in HT1 are examined for the first time in October, with re-examination in January and August
- courses given in HT2 are examined for the first time in January, with re-examination in March and in August.
The examination schedule is based on the structure of timetable modules, but there may be deviations from this, mainly in the case of courses that are studied and examined for several programmes and in lower grades (i.e. 1 and 2).
Examinations for courses that the faculty programme board has decided are to be held in alternate years are held three times during the school year in which the course is given according to the principles stated above.
Examinations for courses that are cancelled or rescheduled such that they are not given in one or several years are held three times during the year that immediately follows the course, with examination scheduling that corresponds to the scheduling that was in force before the course was cancelled or rescheduled.
When a course, or a written or oral examination (TEN, DIT, DAT, MUN), is given for the last time, the regular examination and two re-examinations will be offered. Thereafter, examinations are phased out by offering three examinations during the following academic year at the same times as the examinations in any substitute course. The exception is courses given in the period HT1, where the three examination occasions are January, March and August. If there is no substitute course, three examinations will be offered during re-examination periods during the following academic year. Other examination times are decided by the faculty programme board. In all cases above, the examination is also offered one more time during the academic year after the following, unless the faculty programme board decides otherwise. In total, 6 re-examinations are offered, of which 2 are regular re-examinations. In the examination registration system, the examinations given for the penultimate time and the last time are denoted.
If a course is given during several periods of the year (for programmes, or on different occasions for different programmes) the faculty programme board or boards determine together the scheduling and frequency of re-examination occasions.
For single subject courses, written and oral examinations can be held at other times.
Retakes of other forms of examination
Regulations concerning retakes of other forms of examination than written examinations and digital and computer-based examinations are given in the LiU guidelines for examinations and examiners, Dnr LiU-2023-00379 (http://styrdokument.liu.se/Regelsamling/VisaBeslut/917592).
Course closure
For Decision on Routines for Administration of the Discontinuation of Educational Programs, Freestanding Courses and Courses in Programs, see Dnr LiU-2021-04782 (https://styrdokument.liu.se/Regelsamling/VisaBeslut/1156410). After a decision on closure and after the end of the discontinuation period, the students are referred to a replacement course (or similar) according to information in the course syllabus or programme syllabus. If a student has passed some part/parts of a closed program course but not all, and there is an at least partially replacing course, an assessment of crediting can be made. For questions about the crediting of course components, contact the Study councellors.
Registration for examination
In order to take an written, digital or computer-based examination, registration in advance is mandatory, see decision in the university’s rule book Dnr LiU-2020-04559 (https://styrdokument.liu.se/Regelsamling/VisaBeslut/622682). An unregistered student can thus not be offered a place. The registration is done at the Student Portal or in the LiU-app during the registration period. The registration period opens 30 days before the date of the examination and closes 10 days before the date of the examination. Candidates are informed of the location of the examination by email, four days in advance.
Code of conduct for students during examinations
Details are given in a decision in the university’s rule book, Dnr LiU-2020-04559 (http://styrdokument.liu.se/Regelsamling/VisaBeslut/622682).
Retakes for higher grade
Students at the Institute of Technology at LiU have the right to retake written examinations and digital and computer-based examinations in an attempt to achieve a higher grade. This is valid for all examination components with code “TEN”, “DIT” and "DAT". The same right may not be exercised for other examination components, unless otherwise specified in the course syllabus.
A retake is not possible on courses that are included in an issued degree diploma.
Grades
The grades that are preferably to be used are Fail (U), Pass (3), Pass not without distinction (4) and Pass with distinction (5).
- Grades U, 3, 4, 5 are to be awarded for courses that have written or digital examinations.
- Grades Fail (U) and Pass (G) may be awarded for courses with a large degree of practical components such as laboratory work, project work and group work.
- Grades Fail (U) and Pass (G) are to be used for degree projects and other independent work.
Examination components
The following examination components and associated module codes are used at the Faculty of Science and Engineering:
- Grades U, 3, 4, 5 are to be awarded for written examinations (TEN) and digital examinations (DIT).
- Examination components for which the grades Fail (U) and Pass (G) may be awarded are laboratory work (LAB), project work (PRA), preparatory written examination (KTR), digital preparatory written examination (DIK), oral examination (MUN), computer-based examination in a computer lab (DAT), digital preparatory written examination in a computer lab (DAK), home assignment (HEM), and assignment (UPG).
- Students receive grades either Fail (U) or Pass (G) for other examination components in which the examination criteria are satisfied principally through active attendance such as tutorial group (BAS) or examination item (MOM).
- Grades Fail (U) and Pass (G) are to be used for the examination components Opposition (OPPO) and Attendance at thesis presentation (AUSK) (i.e. part of the degree project).
In general, the following applies:
- Mandatory course components must be scored and given a module code.
- Examination components that are not scored, cannot be mandatory. Hence, it is voluntary to participate in these examinations, and the voluntariness must be clearly stated. Additionally, if there are any associated conditions to the examination component, these must be clearly stated as well.
- For courses with more than one examination component with grades U,3,4,5, it shall be clearly stated how the final grade is weighted.
For mandatory components, the following applies (in accordance with the LiU Guidelines for education and examination for first-cycle and second-cycle education at Linköping University, Dnr LiU-2023-00379 http://styrdokument.liu.se/Regelsamling/VisaBeslut/917592):
- If special circumstances prevail, and if it is possible with consideration of the nature of the compulsory component, the examiner may decide to replace the compulsory component with another equivalent component.
For possibilities to alternative forms of examinations, the following applies (in accordance with the LiU Guidelines for education and examination for first-cycle and second-cycle education at Linköping University, Dnr LiU-2023-00379 http://styrdokument.liu.se/Regelsamling/VisaBeslut/917592):
- If the LiU coordinator for students with disabilities has granted a student the right to an adapted examination for a written examination in an examination hall, the student has the right to it.
- If the coordinator has recommended for the student an adapted examination or alternative form of examination, the examiner may grant this if the examiner assesses that it is possible, based on consideration of the course objectives.
- An examiner may also decide that an adapted examination or alternative form of examination if the examiner assessed that special circumstances prevail, and the examiner assesses that it is possible while maintaing the objectives of the course.
Reporting of examination results
The examination results for a student are reported at the relevant department.
Plagiarism
For examinations that involve the writing of reports, in cases in which it can be assumed that the student has had access to other sources (such as during project work, writing essays, etc.), the material submitted must be prepared in accordance with principles for acceptable practice when referring to sources (references or quotations for which the source is specified) when the text, images, ideas, data, etc. of other people are used. It is also to be made clear whether the author has reused his or her own text, images, ideas, data, etc. from previous examinations, such as degree projects, project reports, etc. (this is sometimes known as “self-plagiarism”).
A failure to specify such sources may be regarded as attempted deception during examination.
Attempts to cheat
In the event of a suspected attempt by a student to cheat during an examination, or when study performance is to be assessed as specified in Chapter 10 of the Higher Education Ordinance, the examiner is to report this to the disciplinary board of the university. Possible consequences for the student are suspension from study and a formal warning. More information is available at Cheating, deception and plagiarism.
Linköping University has also produced a guide for teachers and students' use of generative AI in education (Dnr LiU-2023-02660). As a student, you are always expected to gain knowledge of what applies to each course (including the degree project). In general, clarity to where and how generative AI has been used is important.
Regulations (apply to LiU in its entirety)
The university is a government agency whose operations are regulated by legislation and ordinances, which include the Higher Education Act and the Higher Education Ordinance. In addition to legislation and ordinances, operations are subject to several policy documents. The Linköping University rule book collects currently valid decisions of a regulatory nature taken by the university board, the vice-chancellor and faculty/department boards.
LiU’s rule book for education at first-cycle and second-cycle levels is available at https://styrdokument.liu.se/Regelsamling/Innehall.
Note: The course matrix might contain more information in Swedish.
I | U | A | Modules | Comment | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. DISCIPLINARY KNOWLEDGE AND REASONING | ||||||
1.1 Knowledge of underlying mathematics and science (G1X level) |
|
|
X
|
Knowledge in maths and natural sciences is applied in the project through calculations and use of tools and methods. |
||
1.2 Fundamental engineering knowledge (G1X level) |
|
X
|
X
|
PRA1
DIT1
|
Broad knowledge in engineering design and related topics is deepened in the course and applied in the course project and seminar. |
|
1.3 Further knowledge, methods, and tools in one or several subjects in engineering or natural science (G2X level) |
X
|
X
|
|
PRA1
DIT1
|
Deepened knowledge in engineering design and related topics is deepened in the course and applied in the course seminar. |
|
1.4 Advanced knowledge, methods, and tools in one or several subjects in engineering or natural sciences (A1X level) |
|
X
|
X
|
PRA1
DIT1
|
In-depth and specialized knowledge in engineering design and related topics is deepened in the course and applied in the course project and tested in the final exam. This builds on knowledge as detailed in 1.3, 1.2, and 1.1. |
|
1.5 Insight into current research and development work |
X
|
X
|
X
|
DIT1
|
State-of-the-art research is the basis of the knowledge introduced and build in the scope of the course in terms of understanding the ongoing development in practice as well as applying the new knowledge during the project and showing a full understanding in the exam. |
|
2. PERSONAL AND PROFESSIONAL SKILLS AND ATTRIBUTES | ||||||
2.1 Analytical reasoning and problem solving |
|
X
|
X
|
PRA1
|
Analytical thinking and problem solving are mainly taught and applied in the scope of the project. |
|
2.2 Experimentation, investigation, and knowledge discovery |
|
X
|
X
|
PRA1
|
Experimenting and trialing different methods for ecodesign is a critial focus of the course, particularly in the scope of the course project. |
|
2.3 System thinking |
X
|
X
|
X
|
PRA1
|
Systems thinking is a critical aspect of this course. Knowledge gained in prior courses is applied towards the lifecycle focused design of products and services, particularly in the scope of the course project. |
|
2.4 Attitudes, thought, and learning |
|
|
X
|
DIT1
|
||
2.5 Ethics, equity, and other responsibilities |
X
|
X
|
X
|
PRA1
DIT1
|
Approaching one-another and collaborating without prejudice and based on equality is critical to succeed in the course project. |
|
3. INTERPERSONAL SKILLS: TEAMWORK AND COMMUNICATION | ||||||
3.1 Teamwork |
|
X
|
X
|
PRA1
|
Group work in the scope of the course project is critical to succeed in this course. In case challenges arise, students support one another towards solving these is a self-reliant fashion. Developing these problem-solving skills is a critical aspect of this course. |
|
3.2 Communications |
|
|
X
|
PRA1
|
Students need to organize themselves in the scope of the course project. |
|
3.3 Communication in foreign languages |
|
|
X
|
PRA1
DIT1
|
The course is primarily taught in English, which applies also to the project and reports written. Full command of English is required to succeed in this course. |
|
4. CONCEIVING, DESIGNING, IMPLEMENTING AND OPERATING SYSTEMS IN THE ENTERPRISE, SOCIETAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTEXT | ||||||
4.1 External, societal, and environmental context |
X
|
X
|
X
|
PRA1
DIT1
|
The course has a growing focus on sustainable development and the shift towards a circular economy and introduces, deepens and applies knowledge in that context. Engineering no longer happens in a bubble, it is shaped and shapes the would it is surrounded by. |
|
4.2 Enterprise and business context |
|
X
|
|
PRA1
|
By introducing current and highly-relevant insight from industry, the context of companies confronted with the shift towards lifecycle focused offerings in the context of a circular economy is discussed and applied in the scope of the project. |
|
4.3 Conceiving, system engineering and management |
X
|
X
|
X
|
PRA1
DIT1
|
This aspect is central to the course and therefore, product and systems design and related skills and knowledge are introduced, taught and applied in-depth in this course. |
|
4.4 Designing |
X
|
X
|
X
|
PRA1
DIT1
|
This aspect is central to the course and therefore, product and systems design and related skills and knowledge are introduced, taught and applied in-depth in this course. Here, this mainly applies to the project-part of the course. |
|
4.5 Implementing |
|
X
|
|
PRA1
|
Students are encouraged to develop (digital) prototypes for their newly-designed product-service offerings. Thus, full real-world realization is out of scope. |
|
4.6 Operating |
|
|
|
|||
5. PLANNING, EXECUTION AND PRESENTATION OF RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH RESPECT TO SCIENTIFIC AND SOCIETAL NEEDS AND REQUIREMENTS | ||||||
5.1 Societal conditions, including economic, social, and ecological aspects of sustainable development for knowledge development |
X
|
X
|
X
|
PRA1
DIT1
|
Considerations on the environmental and societal impacts of ecodesign and moving towards a more circular business are important in the course and students are encouraged to consider these when starting their development project. |
|
5.2 Economic conditions for knowledge development |
|
|
|
|||
5.3 Identification of needs, structuring and planning of research or development projects |
|
X
|
X
|
PRA1
DIT1
|
Students design a development project in groups of 2-3 students according to their own structure and time planning. |
|
5.4 Execution of research or development projects |
|
X
|
X
|
PRA1
DIT1
|
Students execute their development project, applying ecodesign methods to an existing product, in groups of 2-3 with supervision support from a teacher. |
|
5.5 Presentation and evaluation of research or development projects |
|
X
|
X
|
PRA1
|
Students present the results of their development projects in a final presentation at the end of the project work. |
This tab contains public material from the course room in Lisam. The information published here is not legally binding, such material can be found under the other tabs on this page.
There are no files available for this course.