Project Course CDIO, 12 credits

Projektkurs, CDIO, 12 hp

TNE085

Main field of study

Electrical Engineering

Course level

Second cycle

Course type

Programme course

Examiner

Andrés Alayón Glazunov

Director of studies or equivalent

Kjell Karlsson

Education components

Preliminary scheduled hours: 38 h
Recommended self-study hours: 282 h

Available for exchange students

Yes
ECV = Elective / Compulsory / Voluntary
Course offered for Semester Period Timetable module Language Campus ECV
6CIEN Electronics Design Engineering, Master of Science in Engineering 9 (Autumn 2026) 1, 2 3, 3 Swedish/English Norrköping, Norrköping C

Main field of study

Electrical Engineering

Course level

Second cycle

Advancement level

A1F

Specific information

Exchange students may apply for the course after arrival to LiTH but before it starts. The Faculty coordinators for exchange studies must be contacted before applying.

Course offered for

  • Master of Science in Electronics Design Engineering

Prerequisites

Analog electronics, digital electronics, circuit theory, micro-computers, signals and systems, mobile communications, wireless systems and networks, basic knowledge in printed circuit board manufacturing, basic programming skills. Knowledge and skills to carry out a project under a design model such as LIPS.

Intended learning outcomes

The purpose of this course is that students should work with a major project, from feasibility studies to finished prototype. The "CDIO syllabus" serves as governing policy on the learning goals.

The student selects a project within electronics design or data/telecommunication, applying previously acquired knowledge, and acquires new knowledge when necessary to conduct the project. The project work should be conducted in a professional manner, and student should develop and consolidate skills according to "CDIO Syllabus", by:

  • Applying knowledge and methods from previous courses, especially analog and digital electronics, microcomputers, programming, wireless communication systems, mobile communications and networks etc.
  • Acquiring new knowledge when necessary.
  • Combining knowledge from different disciplines, such as communication electronics, power electronics, microcomputers, programming, wireless communication systems and networks etc. and applying them in new contexts.
  • Formulating a set of requirements for the project based on a project charter, and thereby assess the project's feasibility in terms of technology and available resources
  • Presenting the project results both for the client and also for other students, who cannot be presumed to be specialists in the technical areas covered by the project.
  • Demonstrating the ability to independently manage project work with the support of a project model and with limited resources in terms of personnel, equipment and time.
  • Planning, implementing and monitoring a project.
  • Analyzing and structuring problems, and analyzing and drawing conclusions from the results.
  • Taking the initiative in finding creative solutions.
  • Actively contributing to the project to run smoothly through good team work and social skills.

    The results of the project should:
  • Hold high technical quality and must be based on up-to-date knowledge and methods in electronic design or communication systems/networks.
  • Be documented in the form of project plan and project timetable, and in the form of a technical report.
  • Be presented orally and in the form of a demonstration of a prototype (design).
  • Be of such good quality (in terms of documents and construction wise) that can be followed by future students.

    The course aims also that students assimilate knowledge and entrepreneurial skills, with an emphasis on business planning for new activities. After the course the student should also:

  • Be able describing requirements for new enterprises.
  • Be able describing the information and analysis needed to evaluate a development project from a commercial perspective, and have the ability to collect and analyze relevant information for this purpose.

    Course content

    The idea is that this should be a larger final project in electronic design closely related to various electronic courses in later years of the program. The projects may vary from year to year and, if requested, may be carried out on behalf of a company.

    The course includes a section on entrepreneurship that is jointly taught with project courses at Campus Valla.

    Teaching and working methods

    The course consists of a few introductory lectures, the rest is self-study. Each project team, composed of 5-8 students (depending on the total number of students in the course, will be assigned a mentor who supports the group in its work. There is also a limited access to technical experts. 

    For each project there is a client, with whom the project team negotiates the terms, conditions and specifications.

    Before the project work begins the team should prepare a project timetable. Projects must be conducted according to the LIPS model. Requirements, specifications, milestones and timetable and other project documents should follow the templates that are included in LIPS. 

    The course includes a section on entrepreneurship that is jointly taught with project courses at Campus Valla.

    The course runs over the entire autumn semester.

    Examination

    UPG1Assignments on entrepreneurship, report3 creditsU, G
    PRA1Project9 creditsU, G
    PRA2Project international, part 16 creditsU, G
    PRA3Project international, part 23 creditsU, G

    Within the course, the project work can be carried out in its entirety at LiU (PRA1) alternatively in collaboration with INSA Toulouse (PRA2+PRA3).

    The project work will be examined against the learning goals mentioned in the CDIO Syllabus. Especially the following aspects of the project will be examined.

    • The quality of all supplied documents (according to the LIPS project model).
    • The quality of the oral presentation and the subsequent (public) demonstration.
    • The quality of the technical approach / design. To pass the project, all the above parts are to be approved. In addition, a report on entrepreneurship to be accepted and approved.

    Grades

    Two grade scale, older version, U, G

    Other information

    About teaching and examination language

    The teaching language is presented in the Overview tab for each course. The examination language relates to the teaching language as follows: 

    • If teaching language is “Swedish”, the course as a whole could be given in Swedish, or partly in English. Examination language is Swedish, but parts of the examination can be in English.
    • If teaching language is “English”, the course as a whole is taught in English. Examination language is English.
    • If teaching language is “Swedish/English”, the course as a whole will be taught in English if students without prior knowledge of the Swedish language participate. Examination language is Swedish or English depending on teaching language.

    Other

    The course is conducted in such a way that there are equal opportunities with regard to sex, transgender identity or expression, ethnicity, religion or other belief, disability, sexual orientation and age.

    The planning and implementation of a course should correspond to the course syllabus. The course evaluation should therefore be conducted with the course syllabus as a starting point. 

    The course is campus-based at the location specified for the course, unless otherwise stated under “Teaching and working methods”. Please note, in a campus-based course occasional remote sessions could be included.  

    Department

    Institutionen för teknik och naturvetenskap

    Course literature

    Compendia

    Other

Code Name Scope Grading scale
UPG1 Assignments on entrepreneurship, report 3 credits U, G
PRA1 Project 9 credits U, G
PRA2 Project international, part 1 6 credits U, G
PRA3 Project international, part 2 3 credits U, G

Within the course, the project work can be carried out in its entirety at LiU (PRA1) alternatively in collaboration with INSA Toulouse (PRA2+PRA3).

The project work will be examined against the learning goals mentioned in the CDIO Syllabus. Especially the following aspects of the project will be examined.

  • The quality of all supplied documents (according to the LIPS project model).
  • The quality of the oral presentation and the subsequent (public) demonstration.
  • The quality of the technical approach / design. To pass the project, all the above parts are to be approved. In addition, a report on entrepreneurship to be accepted and approved.

Course syllabus

A syllabus must be established for each course. The syllabus specifies the aim and contents of the course, and the prior knowledge that a student must have in order to be able to benefit from the course.

Timetabling

Program courses are timetabled after a decision has been made for this course concerning its assignment to a timetable module. Single subject courses can be timetabled at other times.

Interruption in and deregistration from a course

The LiU decision, Guidelines concerning confirmation of participation in education, Dnr LiU-2020-02256 (https://styrdokument.liu.se/Regelsamling/VisaBeslut/764582), states that interruptions in study are to be recorded in Ladok. Thus, all students who do not participate in a course for which they have registered are therefore obliged to report the interruption so that this can be noted in Ladok. Deregistration from or interrupting a course is carried out using a Web-based form.

Cancelled courses and changes to the course syllabus

Courses with few participants (fewer than 10) may be cancelled or organised in a manner that differs from that stated in the course syllabus. The Dean is to deliberate and decide whether a course is to be cancelled or changed from the course syllabus. For single subject courses, the cancellation must be done before students are admitted to the course (in accordance with LiUs regulation Dnr LiU-2022-01200, https://styrdokument.liu.se/Regelsamling/VisaBeslut/622645).

Guidelines relating to examinations and examiners 

For details, see Guidelines for education and examination for first-cycle and second-cycle education at Linköping University, Dnr LiU-2023-00379  (http://styrdokument.liu.se/Regelsamling/VisaBeslut/917592).

An examiner must be employed as a teacher at LiU according to the LiU Regulations for Appointments, Dnr LiU-2022-04445 (https://styrdokument.liu.se/Regelsamling/VisaBeslut/622784). For courses in second-cycle, the following teachers can be appointed as examiner: Professor (including Adjunct and Visiting Professor), Associate Professor (including Adjunct), Senior Lecturer (including Adjunct and Visiting Senior Lecturer), Research Fellow, or Postdoc. For courses in first-cycle, Assistant Lecturer (including Adjunct and Visiting Assistant Lecturer) can also be appointed as examiner in addition to those listed for second-cycle courses. In exceptional cases, a Part-time Lecturer can also be appointed as an examiner at both first- and second cycle, see Delegation of authority for the Board of Faculty of Science and Engineering.

Forms of examination

Principles for examination

Written and oral examinations and digital and computer-based examinations are held at least three times a year: once immediately after the end of the course, once in August, and once (usually) in one of the re-examination periods. Examinations held at other times are to follow a decision of the faculty programme board.

Principles for examination scheduling for courses that follow the study periods:

  • courses given in VT1 are examined for the first time in March, with re-examination in June and August
  • courses given in VT2 are examined for the first time in May, with re-examination in August and January
  • courses given in HT1 are examined for the first time in October, with re-examination in January and August
  • courses given in HT2 are examined for the first time in January, with re-examination in March and in August.

The examination schedule is based on the structure of timetable modules, but there may be deviations from this, mainly in the case of courses that are studied and examined for several programmes and in lower grades (i.e. 1 and 2). 

Examinations for courses that the faculty programme board has decided are to be held in alternate years are held three times during the school year in which the course is given according to the principles stated above.

Examinations for courses that are cancelled or rescheduled such that they are not given in one or several years are held three times during the year that immediately follows the course, with examination scheduling that corresponds to the scheduling that was in force before the course was cancelled or rescheduled.

When a course, or a written or oral examination (TEN, DIT, DAT, MUN), is given for the last time, the regular examination and two re-examinations will be offered. Thereafter, examinations are phased out by offering three examinations during the following academic year at the same times as the examinations in any substitute course. The exception is courses given in the period HT1, where the three examination occasions are January, March and August. If there is no substitute course, three examinations will be offered during re-examination periods during the following academic year. Other examination times are decided by the faculty programme board. In all cases above, the examination is also offered one more time during the academic year after the following, unless the faculty programme board decides otherwise. In total, 6 re-examinations are offered, of which 2 are regular re-examinations. In the examination registration system, the examinations given for the penultimate time and the last time are denoted. 

If a course is given during several periods of the year (for programmes, or on different occasions for different programmes) the faculty programme board or boards determine together the scheduling and frequency of re-examination occasions.

For single subject courses, written and oral examinations can be held at other times.  

Retakes of other forms of examination

Regulations concerning retakes of other forms of examination than written examinations and digital and computer-based examinations are given in the LiU guidelines for examinations and examiners, Dnr LiU-2023-00379 (http://styrdokument.liu.se/Regelsamling/VisaBeslut/917592).

Course closure

For Decision on Routines for Administration of the Discontinuation of Educational Programs, Freestanding Courses and Courses in Programs, see Dnr LiU-2021-04782 (https://styrdokument.liu.se/Regelsamling/VisaBeslut/1156410). After a decision on closure and after the end of the discontinuation period, the students are referred to a replacement course (or similar) according to information in the course syllabus or programme syllabus. If a student has passed some part/parts of a closed program course but not all, and there is an at least partially replacing course, an assessment of crediting can be made. For questions about the crediting of course components, contact the Study councellors.

Registration for examination

In order to take an written, digital or computer-based examination, registration in advance is mandatory, see decision in the university’s rule book Dnr LiU-2020-04559 (https://styrdokument.liu.se/Regelsamling/VisaBeslut/622682). An unregistered student can thus not be offered a place. The registration is done at the Student Portal or in the LiU-app during the registration period. The registration period opens 30 days before the date of the examination and closes 10 days before the date of the examination. Candidates are informed of the location of the examination by email, four days in advance. 

Code of conduct for students during examinations

Details are given in a decision in the university’s rule book, Dnr LiU-2020-04559 (http://styrdokument.liu.se/Regelsamling/VisaBeslut/622682).

Retakes for higher grade

Students at the Institute of Technology at LiU have the right to retake written examinations and digital and computer-based examinations in an attempt to achieve a higher grade. This is valid for all examination components with code “TEN”, “DIT” and "DAT". The same right may not be exercised for other examination components, unless otherwise specified in the course syllabus.

A retake is not possible on courses that are included in an issued degree diploma. 

Grades

The grades that are preferably to be used are Fail (U), Pass (3), Pass not without distinction (4) and Pass with distinction (5). 

  • Grades U, 3, 4, 5 are to be awarded for courses that have written or digital examinations.
  • Grades Fail (U) and Pass (G) may be awarded for courses with a large degree of practical components such as laboratory work, project work and group work.
  • Grades Fail (U) and Pass (G) are to be used for degree projects and other independent work.

Examination components

The following examination components and associated module codes are used at the Faculty of Science and Engineering:

  • Grades U, 3, 4, 5 are to be awarded for written examinations (TEN) and digital examinations (DIT).
  • Examination components for which the grades Fail (U) and Pass (G) may be awarded are laboratory work (LAB), project work (PRA), preparatory written examination (KTR), digital preparatory written examination (DIK), oral examination (MUN), computer-based examination  in a computer lab (DAT), digital preparatory written examination in a computer lab (DAK), home assignment (HEM), and assignment (UPG).
  • Students receive grades either Fail (U) or Pass (G) for other examination components in which the examination criteria are satisfied principally through active attendance such as tutorial group (BAS) or examination item (MOM).
  • Grades Fail (U) and Pass (G) are to be used for the examination components Opposition (OPPO) and Attendance at thesis presentation (AUSK) (i.e. part of the degree project).

In general, the following applies:

  • Mandatory course components must be scored and given a module code.
  • Examination components that are not scored, cannot be mandatory. Hence, it is voluntary to participate in these examinations, and the voluntariness must be clearly stated. Additionally, if there are any associated conditions to the examination component, these must be clearly stated as well.
  • For courses with more than one examination component with grades U,3,4,5, it shall be clearly stated how the final grade is weighted.

For mandatory components, the following applies (in accordance with the LiU Guidelines for education and examination for first-cycle and second-cycle education at Linköping University, Dnr LiU-2023-00379 http://styrdokument.liu.se/Regelsamling/VisaBeslut/917592): 

  • If special circumstances prevail, and if it is possible with consideration of the nature of the compulsory component, the examiner may decide to replace the compulsory component with another equivalent component.

For possibilities to alternative forms of examinations, the following applies (in accordance with the LiU Guidelines for education and examination for first-cycle and second-cycle education at Linköping University, Dnr LiU-2023-00379 http://styrdokument.liu.se/Regelsamling/VisaBeslut/917592): 

  • If the LiU coordinator for students with disabilities has granted a student the right to an adapted examination for a written examination in an examination hall, the student has the right to it.
  • If the coordinator has recommended for the student an adapted examination or alternative form of examination, the examiner may grant this if the examiner assesses that it is possible, based on consideration of the course objectives.
  • An examiner may also decide that an adapted examination or alternative form of examination if the examiner assessed that special circumstances prevail, and the examiner assesses that it is possible while maintaing the objectives of the course.

Reporting of examination results

The examination results for a student are reported at the relevant department.

Plagiarism

For examinations that involve the writing of reports, in cases in which it can be assumed that the student has had access to other sources (such as during project work, writing essays, etc.), the material submitted must be prepared in accordance with principles for acceptable practice when referring to sources (references or quotations for which the source is specified) when the text, images, ideas, data, etc. of other people are used. It is also to be made clear whether the author has reused his or her own text, images, ideas, data, etc. from previous examinations, such as degree projects, project reports, etc. (this is sometimes known as “self-plagiarism”).

A failure to specify such sources may be regarded as attempted deception during examination.

Attempts to cheat

In the event of a suspected attempt by a student to cheat during an examination, or when study performance is to be assessed as specified in Chapter 10 of the Higher Education Ordinance, the examiner is to report this to the disciplinary board of the university. Possible consequences for the student are suspension from study and a formal warning. More information is available at Cheating, deception and plagiarism.

Linköping University has also produced a guide for teachers and students' use of generative AI in education (Dnr LiU-2023-02660). As a student, you are always expected to gain knowledge of what applies to each course (including the degree project). In general, clarity to where and how generative AI has been used is important.  

Regulations (apply to LiU in its entirety)

The university is a government agency whose operations are regulated by legislation and ordinances, which include the Higher Education Act and the Higher Education Ordinance. In addition to legislation and ordinances, operations are subject to several policy documents. The Linköping University rule book collects currently valid decisions of a regulatory nature taken by the university board, the vice-chancellor and faculty/department boards.

LiU’s rule book for education at first-cycle and second-cycle levels is available at https://styrdokument.liu.se/Regelsamling/Innehall

Compendia

Other

Note: The course matrix might contain more information in Swedish.

I = Introduce, U = Teach, A = Utilize
I U A Modules Comment
1. DISCIPLINARY KNOWLEDGE AND REASONING
1.1 Knowledge of underlying mathematics and science (G1X level)
X
Normally applied in project
1.2 Fundamental engineering knowledge (G1X level)
X
PRA1
Normally applied in project.
1.3 Further knowledge, methods, and tools in one or several subjects in engineering or natural science (G2X level)
X
PRA1
Normally applied in project.
1.4 Advanced knowledge, methods, and tools in one or several subjects in engineering or natural sciences (A1X level)
X
PRA1
Normally applied in project.
1.5 Insight into current research and development work
X
PRA1
In case of external project (enterprise).
2. PERSONAL AND PROFESSIONAL SKILLS AND ATTRIBUTES
2.1 Analytical reasoning and problem solving
X
PRA1
Project work.
2.2 Experimentation, investigation, and knowledge discovery
X
PRA1
Project work.
2.3 System thinking
X
PRA1
Project work.
2.4 Attitudes, thought, and learning
X
PRA1
Project management.
2.5 Ethics, equity, and other responsibilities
X
PRA1
Catched up from earlier experiencies.
3. INTERPERSONAL SKILLS: TEAMWORK AND COMMUNICATION
3.1 Teamwork
X
PRA1
UPG1
Project work and presentation.
3.2 Communications
X
PRA1
UPG1
Project work and presentation.
3.3 Communication in foreign languages
X
UPG1
In case of an English final report.
4. CONCEIVING, DESIGNING, IMPLEMENTING AND OPERATING SYSTEMS IN THE ENTERPRISE, SOCIETAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTEXT
4.1 External, societal, and environmental context
PRA1

                            
4.2 Enterprise and business context
X
PRA1
Some development projects.
4.3 Conceiving, system engineering and management
X
PRA1
Project identification and work.
4.4 Designing
X
PRA1
Project work.
4.5 Implementing
X
PRA1
Final prototype.
4.6 Operating
X
PRA1
Final prototype.
5. PLANNING, EXECUTION AND PRESENTATION OF RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH RESPECT TO SCIENTIFIC AND SOCIETAL NEEDS AND REQUIREMENTS
5.1 Societal conditions, including economic, social, and ecological aspects of sustainable development for knowledge development

                            
5.2 Economic conditions for knowledge development

                            
5.3 Identification of needs, structuring and planning of research or development projects

                            
5.4 Execution of research or development projects
PRA1

                            
5.5 Presentation and evaluation of research or development projects
X
PRA1
UPG1
Presentation and final report.

This tab contains public material from the course room in Lisam. The information published here is not legally binding, such material can be found under the other tabs on this page.

There are no files available for this course.