Student rights and obligations (login required)
Linköping University common rules and regulations (in Swedish)
Thesis, Master Special Education, 30 credits
Uppsats, master Specialpedagogik, 30 hp
949A09
Main field of study
Special EducationCourse level
Second cycleCourse type
Programme courseExaminer
Fredrik AlmCourse coordinator
Fredrik AlmDirector of studies or equivalent
Margareta EngvallECV = Elective / Compulsory / Voluntary
| Course offered for | Semester | Weeks | Language | Campus | ECV | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L7MPD | Late admission, Master program in Special Education, Part time (half time) (Special Education, Part time (half time)) | 5 (Autumn 2020) | 202034-202123 | Swedish | Linköping, Valla | C |
Main field of study
Special EducationCourse level
Second cycleAdvancement level
A2ECourse offered for
- Master´s programme in Pedagogical Practices/Education with Emphasis in Outdoor Didactics/Special Education
Examination
Applies to all courses regardless of grading scale.
- Students failing an exam covering either the entire course or part of the course two times are entitled to have a new examiner appointed for the reexamination.
If the course has a three-graded grading scale (U - VG), following applies:
- Students who have passed an examination may not retake it in order to improve their grades.
The following applies to courses that include a compulsory component:
- If special circumstances prevail, and if it is possible with consideration of the nature of the compulsory component, the examiner may decide to replace the compulsory component with another equivalent component.
If the LiU coordinator for students with disabilities has granted a student the right to an adapted examination for a written examination in an examination hall, the student has the right to it. If the coordinator has instead recommended for the student an adapted examination or alternative form of examination, the examiner may grant this if the examiner assesses that it is possible, based on consideration of the course objectives.
Grades
Three-grade scale, U, G, VGOther information
Planning and implementation of a course must take its starting point in the wording of the syllabus. The course evaluation included in each course must therefore take up the question how well the course agrees with the syllabus.
The course is carried out in such a way that both men´s and women´s experience and knowledge is made visible and developed.
Department
Institutionen för beteendevetenskap och lärande| Code | Name | Scope | Grading scale |
|---|---|---|---|
| UPPS | Thesis | 30 credits | U, G, VG |
| RESP | Respondent | 0 credits | U, G |
| OPPO | Opponent | 0 credits | U, G |
| OBL1 | Mandatory part | 0 credits | D |
Course literature is preliminary.
Obligatorisk litteratur
Enedahl, R. (2016). Digitala verktyg i akademiska studier. En undersökning av användning av digitala verktyg ur ett studentperspektiv. Masteruppsats. Linköpings universitet, Institutionen för beteendevetenskap och lärande.
http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn%3Anbn%3Ase%3Aliu%3Adiva-130992
Grantz, H. (2014). Handla med handlingskompetens. En kvasiexperimentell studie kring undervisning om hållbar konsumtion. Magisteruppsats. Linköpings universitet, Institutionen för beteendevetenskap och lärande.
http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:756835/FULLTEXT01.pdf
Referenslitteratur
Alvesson, M. & Sköldberg, K. (2008). Tolkning och reflektion: vetenskapsfilosofi och kvalitativ metod. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Bergström, G. & Boréus, K. (red.) (2012). Textens mening och makt: metodbok i samhällsvetenskaplig text- och diskursanalys. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Borg, E. & Westerlund, J. (2012). Statistik för beteendevetare. Malmö: Liber.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77-101.
Bryman, A. (2011). Samhällsvetenskapliga metoder. Malmö: Liber.
Christoffersen, L. & Johannessen, A. (2015). Forskningsmetoder för lärarstudenter. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Creswell, J., & Plano Clark, V. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousands Oaks: SAGE
Eriksson Barajas, K., Forsberg C. & Wengström Y. (2013). Systematiska litteraturstudier i utbildningsvetenskap. Vägledning vid examensarbeten och vetenskapliga artiklar. Stockholm: Natur & Kultur (Kap. 1-5).
Fejes, A. & Thornberg, R. (red.) (2015). Handbok i kvalitativ analys. Stockholm: Liber.
Forsberg, C. (2014). Lär dina studenter att skriva. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Holme, I.M. & Solvang, B.K. (1997). Forskningsmetodik: om kvalitativa och kvantitativa metoder. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Kullberg, B. (2014). Etnografi i klassrummet. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Kvale, S. & Brinkmann, S. (2014). Den kvalitativa forskningsintervjun. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Lantz, B. (2014). Den statistiska undersökningen: grundläggande metodik och typiska problem. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Nilholm, C. (2016). Teori i examensarbetet–en vägledning för lärarstudenter. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Rennstam, J. & Wästerfors, D. (2015). Från stoff till studie: om analysarbete i kvalitativ forskning. (1. uppl.) Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Repstad, P. (2007). Närhet och distans: kvalitativa metoder i samhällsvetenskap. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
This tab contains public material from the course room in Lisam. The information published here is not legally binding, such material can be found under the other tabs on this page.
There are no files available for this course.