Educational Assessment in Didactic Processes, 7.5 credits

Bedömning och betygssättning i didaktiska processer, 7.5 hp


Main field of study

No main field of study

Course level

Second cycle

Course type

Programme course


Agneta Grönlund

Course coordinator

Agneta Grönlund, Elisabeth Eriksson, Tobias Jansson

Director of studies or equivalent

Margareta Engvall
ECV = Elective / Compulsory / Voluntary

Main field of study

No main field of study

Course level

Second cycle

Advancement level


Course offered for

  • Complementary Educational Programme - Secondary School Teacher Programme - Years 7-9
  • Complementary Educational Programme - Secondary School Teacher Programme - Upper Secondary


Applies to all courses regardless of grading scale.

  • Students failing an exam covering either the entire course or part of the course two times are entitled to have a new examiner appointed for the reexamination.

If the course has a three-graded grading scale (U - VG), following applies:

  • Students who have passed an examination may not retake it in order to improve their grades.

The following applies to courses that include a compulsory component:

  • If special circumstances prevail, and if it is possible with consideration of the nature of the compulsory component, the examiner may decide to replace the compulsory component with another equivalent component.

If the LiU coordinator for students with disabilities has granted a student the right to an adapted examination for a written examination in an examination hall, the student has the right to it. If the coordinator has instead recommended for the student an adapted examination or alternative form of examination, the examiner may grant this if the examiner assesses that it is possible, based on consideration of the course objectives.


Three-grade scale, U, G, VG

Other information

Planning and implementation of a course must take its starting point in the wording of the syllabus. The course evaluation included in each course must therefore take up the question how well the course agrees with the syllabus.

The course is carried out in such a way that both men´s and women´s experience and knowledge is made visible and developed.


Institutionen för beteendevetenskap och lärande
Code Name Scope Grading scale
STN3 Written exam 5 credits U, G, VG
STN2 Written exam 1.5 credits U, G
MRE1 Written exam 1 credits U, G


Jönsson, Anders, (2020) Lärande bedömning. Femte upplagan Malmö : Gleerups, [2020]

ISBN: 9789151104171

Korp, Helena, (2011) Kunskapsbedömning : vad, hur och varför? : [kunskapsöversikt] Stockholm : Skolverket : Fritze [distributör], 2011
Lundgren, Ulf P., Säljö, Roger, Liberg, Caroline, (2017) Lärande, skola, bildning Fjärde utgåvan, reviderad [Stockholm] : Natur & kultur, [2017]
Nordgren, Kenneth, Odenstad, Christina, Samuelsson, Johan, (2017) Betyg i teori och praktik : ämnesdidaktiska perspektiv på bedömning i grundskola och gymnasium 3. uppl. Malmö : Gleerups Utbildning AB, 2017


Green, S., Johnson, R., Kim, D-H & Pope, N., Ethics in classroom assessment practices: Issues and attitudes Teaching and Teacher Education 23(7)/2007/99-1011
Havnes, Anton; Smith, Kari; Dysthe, Olga & Ludvigsen, Kristine, Formative assessment and feedback: Making learning visible Studies in Educational Evaluation 38(1)/2012/21-27
Jönsson, A. & Thornberg, P., Samsyn eller samstämmighet? En diskussion om sambedömning som redskap för likvärdig bedömning i skolan Pedagogisk forskning 19/2014/4-5
Löfgren, R., I Lindberg, V., Eriksson, I. & Pettersson, A. (red.). , Feedback som grund för olika positioner i kemiundervisningen Formativ bedömning: utmaningar för undervisningen. Stockholm: Natur & kultur. 2019

This tab contains public material from the course room in Lisam. The information published here is not legally binding, such material can be found under the other tabs on this page.

There are no files available for this course.