Biomedical Engineering - Project Course, 12 credits
Projektkurs i medicinsk teknik, CDIO, 12 hp
TBMT14
Main field of study
Biomedical EngineeringCourse level
Second cycleCourse type
Programme courseExaminer
Marcus LarssonDirector of studies or equivalent
Marcus LarssonEducation components
Preliminary scheduled hours: 96 hRecommended self-study hours: 224 h
Available for exchange students
YesMain field of study
Biomedical EngineeringCourse level
Second cycleAdvancement level
A1FSpecific information
The Entrepreneurship part overlap with other CDIO courses and cannot be included more than once in a degree.
Exchange students may apply for the course after arrival to LiTH but before it starts. The Faculty coordinators for exchange studies must be contacted before applying.
Course offered for
- Master of Science in Biomedical Engineering
- Master of Science in Applied Physics and Electrical Engineering
- Master of Science in Applied Physics and Electrical Engineering - International
- Master's Programme in Biomedical Engineering
Prerequisites
Basic knowledge in physics, mathematics, electronics, programming and signal processing. Previous experience of the Lips model, or similar model. Specific knowledge in Biomedical engineering and Anatomy and physiology.
Intended learning outcomes
The course aims to consolidate the student's engineering and professional ability to plan, manage and implement an industrial-like project using the CDIO (Conceive - Design - Implement - Operate) concept. During the course, the student will also develop and consolidate its biomedical engineering excellence, especially within the field of the project. After completing the project course, the student should be able to:
- identify biomedical needs and suggest solutions/actions.
- analyze and structure problems with respect to a priori knowledge.
- create and implement new knowledge within the biomedical engineering domain based on synthesis from other engineering core domains.
- demonstrate biomedical engineering solutions to well-defined needs or problems.
- critically examine project proposals and solutions.
- document and follow up of project plan and time plans.
- develop power of initiative and demonstrate creative solutions.
- actively participating and well functioning in at least one project group.
- present project results, both written and orally, acquired within a given time period and budget.
- plan, document and execute a project according to a predetermined project model, with efficient use of material and human resources.
A purpose for the course is also for the students to acquire knowledge and abilities within the general area of entrepreneurship, with particular focus on business planning for new ventures. After the course, students should be able to:
- account for models that describe what it takes for a new venture to have a stable basis for further development and to asess the level of development of ventures using such models; and
- account for the information and analyses needed to evaluate a development project from a business point of view and have the ability to collect and analyse relevant information for the purpose.
Course content
The project course serves as an umbrella for a variety of projects with a biomedical engineering focus. The projects will be application focused and may vary from year to year. For example: body-worn sensors, bio-optical imaging and diagnostic systems, biomedical model analysis, medical information systems, and medical imaging. For more detailed information please refer to the course website. The projects are of prototype character but should demonstrate the possibility of being turned into a commercial product.
Teaching and working methods
At the start of the project a directive describing the client needs is given to each project group. Based on this directive, the project team will negotiate with the client to agree upon a set of requirements that are considered relevant in relation to the given time and resources. Resources in all forms are known at the start of the project. Project management is exercised in accordance with the LIPS model (full scale). The group consists of at least four participants but usually between 5-8. The group size requires scalability of the specifications. The group is also assigned a supervisor.
The course runs throughout the fall semester, where a requirements specification and a project plan constitutes the first part of the project. Design, implementation, documentation, delivery and evaluation of the project constitutes the second part.
Examination
UPG1 | Entrepreneurship assignments | 3 credits | U, G |
PRA2 | Project work | 9 credits | U, G |
The project work is assessed on the basis of the fulfillment of the course objectives. The assessment is based on the written documentation, the oral presentation and the ability to conduct a successful project work. To pass the entire project work, it is required that all parts are approved.
If the amount of exchange students are numerous the education is performed in English. If not, exchange students will be tutored individually in English.
Grades are given as ‘Fail’ or ‘Pass’.
Grades
Two grade scale, older version, U, GOther information
About teaching and examination language
The teaching language is presented in the Overview tab for each course. The examination language relates to the teaching language as follows:
- If teaching language is “Swedish”, the course as a whole could be given in Swedish, or partly in English. Examination language is Swedish, but parts of the examination can be in English.
- If teaching language is “English”, the course as a whole is taught in English. Examination language is English.
- If teaching language is “Swedish/English”, the course as a whole will be taught in English if students without prior knowledge of the Swedish language participate. Examination language is Swedish or English depending on teaching language.
Other
The course is conducted in such a way that there are equal opportunities with regard to sex, transgender identity or expression, ethnicity, religion or other belief, disability, sexual orientation and age.
The planning and implementation of a course should correspond to the course syllabus. The course evaluation should therefore be conducted with the course syllabus as a starting point.
The course is campus-based at the location specified for the course, unless otherwise stated under “Teaching and working methods”. Please note, in a campus-based course occasional remote sessions could be included.
Department
Institutionen för medicinsk teknikCourse literature
Regulary literature
Other
Additional literature
Books
- T. Svensson & C. Krysander, (2011) Project model Lips 1:1 Studentlitteratur
ISBN: 978-91-44-07526-6 - T. Svensson & C. Krysander, (2011) Projektmodellen Lips 1:1 Studentlitteratur
ISBN: 978-91-44-07525-9
Code | Name | Scope | Grading scale |
---|---|---|---|
UPG1 | Entrepreneurship assignments | 3 credits | U, G |
PRA2 | Project work | 9 credits | U, G |
The project work is assessed on the basis of the fulfillment of the course objectives. The assessment is based on the written documentation, the oral presentation and the ability to conduct a successful project work. To pass the entire project work, it is required that all parts are approved.
If the amount of exchange students are numerous the education is performed in English. If not, exchange students will be tutored individually in English.
Grades are given as ‘Fail’ or ‘Pass’.
Course syllabus
A syllabus must be established for each course. The syllabus specifies the aim and contents of the course, and the prior knowledge that a student must have in order to be able to benefit from the course.
Timetabling
Program courses are timetabled after a decision has been made for this course concerning its assignment to a timetable module. Single subject courses can be timetabled at other times.
Interruption in and deregistration from a course
The LiU decision, Guidelines concerning confirmation of participation in education, Dnr LiU-2020-02256 (https://styrdokument.liu.se/Regelsamling/VisaBeslut/764582), states that interruptions in study are to be recorded in Ladok. Thus, all students who do not participate in a course for which they have registered are therefore obliged to report the interruption so that this can be noted in Ladok. Deregistration from or interrupting a course is carried out using a Web-based form.
Cancelled courses and changes to the course syllabus
Courses with few participants (fewer than 10) may be cancelled or organised in a manner that differs from that stated in the course syllabus. The Dean is to deliberate and decide whether a course is to be cancelled or changed from the course syllabus. For single subject courses, the cancellation must be done before students are admitted to the course (in accordance with LiUs regulation Dnr LiU-2022-01200, https://styrdokument.liu.se/Regelsamling/VisaBeslut/622645).
Guidelines relating to examinations and examiners
For details, see Guidelines for education and examination for first-cycle and second-cycle education at Linköping University, Dnr LiU-2023-00379 (http://styrdokument.liu.se/Regelsamling/VisaBeslut/917592).
An examiner must be employed as a teacher at LiU according to the LiU Regulations for Appointments, Dnr LiU-2022-04445 (https://styrdokument.liu.se/Regelsamling/VisaBeslut/622784). For courses in second-cycle, the following teachers can be appointed as examiner: Professor (including Adjunct and Visiting Professor), Associate Professor (including Adjunct), Senior Lecturer (including Adjunct and Visiting Senior Lecturer), Research Fellow, or Postdoc. For courses in first-cycle, Assistant Lecturer (including Adjunct and Visiting Assistant Lecturer) can also be appointed as examiner in addition to those listed for second-cycle courses. In exceptional cases, a Part-time Lecturer can also be appointed as an examiner at both first- and second cycle, see Delegation of authority for the Board of Faculty of Science and Engineering.
Forms of examination
Principles for examination
Written and oral examinations and digital and computer-based examinations are held at least three times a year: once immediately after the end of the course, once in August, and once (usually) in one of the re-examination periods. Examinations held at other times are to follow a decision of the faculty programme board.
Principles for examination scheduling for courses that follow the study periods:
- courses given in VT1 are examined for the first time in March, with re-examination in June and August
- courses given in VT2 are examined for the first time in May, with re-examination in August and January
- courses given in HT1 are examined for the first time in October, with re-examination in January and August
- courses given in HT2 are examined for the first time in January, with re-examination in March and in August.
The examination schedule is based on the structure of timetable modules, but there may be deviations from this, mainly in the case of courses that are studied and examined for several programmes and in lower grades (i.e. 1 and 2).
Examinations for courses that the faculty programme board has decided are to be held in alternate years are held three times during the school year in which the course is given according to the principles stated above.
Examinations for courses that are cancelled or rescheduled such that they are not given in one or several years are held three times during the year that immediately follows the course, with examination scheduling that corresponds to the scheduling that was in force before the course was cancelled or rescheduled.
When a course, or a written or oral examination (TEN, DIT, DAT, MUN), is given for the last time, the regular examination and two re-examinations will be offered. Thereafter, examinations are phased out by offering three examinations during the following academic year at the same times as the examinations in any substitute course. The exception is courses given in the period HT1, where the three examination occasions are January, March and August. If there is no substitute course, three examinations will be offered during re-examination periods during the following academic year. Other examination times are decided by the faculty programme board. In all cases above, the examination is also offered one more time during the academic year after the following, unless the faculty programme board decides otherwise. In total, 6 re-examinations are offered, of which 2 are regular re-examinations. In the examination registration system, the examinations given for the penultimate time and the last time are denoted.
If a course is given during several periods of the year (for programmes, or on different occasions for different programmes) the faculty programme board or boards determine together the scheduling and frequency of re-examination occasions.
For single subject courses, written and oral examinations can be held at other times.
Retakes of other forms of examination
Regulations concerning retakes of other forms of examination than written examinations and digital and computer-based examinations are given in the LiU guidelines for examinations and examiners, Dnr LiU-2023-00379 (http://styrdokument.liu.se/Regelsamling/VisaBeslut/917592).
Course closure
For Decision on Routines for Administration of the Discontinuation of Educational Programs, Freestanding Courses and Courses in Programs, see Dnr LiU-2021-04782 (https://styrdokument.liu.se/Regelsamling/VisaBeslut/1156410). After a decision on closure and after the end of the discontinuation period, the students are referred to a replacement course (or similar) according to information in the course syllabus or programme syllabus. If a student has passed some part/parts of a closed program course but not all, and there is an at least partially replacing course, an assessment of crediting can be made. For questions about the crediting of course components, contact the Study councellors.
Registration for examination
In order to take an written, digital or computer-based examination, registration in advance is mandatory, see decision in the university’s rule book Dnr LiU-2020-04559 (https://styrdokument.liu.se/Regelsamling/VisaBeslut/622682). An unregistered student can thus not be offered a place. The registration is done at the Student Portal or in the LiU-app during the registration period. The registration period opens 30 days before the date of the examination and closes 10 days before the date of the examination. Candidates are informed of the location of the examination by email, four days in advance.
Code of conduct for students during examinations
Details are given in a decision in the university’s rule book, Dnr LiU-2020-04559 (http://styrdokument.liu.se/Regelsamling/VisaBeslut/622682).
Retakes for higher grade
Students at the Institute of Technology at LiU have the right to retake written examinations and digital and computer-based examinations in an attempt to achieve a higher grade. This is valid for all examination components with code “TEN”, “DIT” and "DAT". The same right may not be exercised for other examination components, unless otherwise specified in the course syllabus.
A retake is not possible on courses that are included in an issued degree diploma.
Grades
The grades that are preferably to be used are Fail (U), Pass (3), Pass not without distinction (4) and Pass with distinction (5).
- Grades U, 3, 4, 5 are to be awarded for courses that have written or digital examinations.
- Grades Fail (U) and Pass (G) may be awarded for courses with a large degree of practical components such as laboratory work, project work and group work.
- Grades Fail (U) and Pass (G) are to be used for degree projects and other independent work.
Examination components
The following examination components and associated module codes are used at the Faculty of Science and Engineering:
- Grades U, 3, 4, 5 are to be awarded for written examinations (TEN) and digital examinations (DIT).
- Examination components for which the grades Fail (U) and Pass (G) may be awarded are laboratory work (LAB), project work (PRA), preparatory written examination (KTR), digital preparatory written examination (DIK), oral examination (MUN), computer-based examination in a computer lab (DAT), digital preparatory written examination in a computer lab (DAK), home assignment (HEM), and assignment (UPG).
- Students receive grades either Fail (U) or Pass (G) for other examination components in which the examination criteria are satisfied principally through active attendance such as tutorial group (BAS) or examination item (MOM).
- Grades Fail (U) and Pass (G) are to be used for the examination components Opposition (OPPO) and Attendance at thesis presentation (AUSK) (i.e. part of the degree project).
In general, the following applies:
- Mandatory course components must be scored and given a module code.
- Examination components that are not scored, cannot be mandatory. Hence, it is voluntary to participate in these examinations, and the voluntariness must be clearly stated. Additionally, if there are any associated conditions to the examination component, these must be clearly stated as well.
- For courses with more than one examination component with grades U,3,4,5, it shall be clearly stated how the final grade is weighted.
For mandatory components, the following applies (in accordance with the LiU Guidelines for education and examination for first-cycle and second-cycle education at Linköping University, Dnr LiU-2023-00379 http://styrdokument.liu.se/Regelsamling/VisaBeslut/917592):
- If special circumstances prevail, and if it is possible with consideration of the nature of the compulsory component, the examiner may decide to replace the compulsory component with another equivalent component.
For possibilities to alternative forms of examinations, the following applies (in accordance with the LiU Guidelines for education and examination for first-cycle and second-cycle education at Linköping University, Dnr LiU-2023-00379 http://styrdokument.liu.se/Regelsamling/VisaBeslut/917592):
- If the LiU coordinator for students with disabilities has granted a student the right to an adapted examination for a written examination in an examination hall, the student has the right to it.
- If the coordinator has recommended for the student an adapted examination or alternative form of examination, the examiner may grant this if the examiner assesses that it is possible, based on consideration of the course objectives.
- An examiner may also decide that an adapted examination or alternative form of examination if the examiner assessed that special circumstances prevail, and the examiner assesses that it is possible while maintaing the objectives of the course.
Reporting of examination results
The examination results for a student are reported at the relevant department.
Plagiarism
For examinations that involve the writing of reports, in cases in which it can be assumed that the student has had access to other sources (such as during project work, writing essays, etc.), the material submitted must be prepared in accordance with principles for acceptable practice when referring to sources (references or quotations for which the source is specified) when the text, images, ideas, data, etc. of other people are used. It is also to be made clear whether the author has reused his or her own text, images, ideas, data, etc. from previous examinations, such as degree projects, project reports, etc. (this is sometimes known as “self-plagiarism”).
A failure to specify such sources may be regarded as attempted deception during examination.
Attempts to cheat
In the event of a suspected attempt by a student to cheat during an examination, or when study performance is to be assessed as specified in Chapter 10 of the Higher Education Ordinance, the examiner is to report this to the disciplinary board of the university. Possible consequences for the student are suspension from study and a formal warning. More information is available at Cheating, deception and plagiarism.
Linköping University has also produced a guide for teachers and students' use of generative AI in education (Dnr LiU-2023-02660). As a student, you are always expected to gain knowledge of what applies to each course (including the degree project). In general, clarity to where and how generative AI has been used is important.
Regulations (apply to LiU in its entirety)
The university is a government agency whose operations are regulated by legislation and ordinances, which include the Higher Education Act and the Higher Education Ordinance. In addition to legislation and ordinances, operations are subject to several policy documents. The Linköping University rule book collects currently valid decisions of a regulatory nature taken by the university board, the vice-chancellor and faculty/department boards.
LiU’s rule book for education at first-cycle and second-cycle levels is available at https://styrdokument.liu.se/Regelsamling/Innehall.
Regulary literature
Other
Additional literature
Books
ISBN: 978-91-44-07526-6
ISBN: 978-91-44-07525-9
Note: The course matrix might contain more information in Swedish.
I | U | A | Modules | Comment | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. DISCIPLINARY KNOWLEDGE AND REASONING | ||||||
1.1 Knowledge of underlying mathematics and science (G1X level) |
|
|
X
|
Physics, mathematics, biology, chemistry |
||
1.2 Fundamental engineering knowledge (G1X level) |
|
|
X
|
Biomedical engineering, programming |
||
1.3 Further knowledge, methods, and tools in one or several subjects in engineering or natural science (G2X level) |
|
|
X
|
Biomedical engineering, programming |
||
1.4 Advanced knowledge, methods, and tools in one or several subjects in engineering or natural sciences (A1X level) |
|
X
|
X
|
The project work (PRA1) includes designing and implementing a technical solution with engineering methods that usually includes collecting, analyzing and presenting data. The subject depends on the nature of the project. Teaching occurs on request (e.g. expert help) and is tailored to the current need of the students. |
||
1.5 Insight into current research and development work |
|
X
|
X
|
The project work includes activities where current state-of-the-art solutions are studied. |
||
2. PERSONAL AND PROFESSIONAL SKILLS AND ATTRIBUTES | ||||||
2.1 Analytical reasoning and problem solving |
|
X
|
X
|
Project work is done according to LIPS and CDIO framwork. Teaching occurs on request (e.g. expert help) and is tailored to the current need of the students. |
||
2.2 Experimentation, investigation, and knowledge discovery |
|
|
X
|
Project work is done according to LIPS and CDIO framwork, where an "experimental and investigative" way of working is central. |
||
2.3 System thinking |
|
X
|
X
|
The project includes the design and implementation of a complex technical solution that is documented according to the LIPS model (system sketch and design specification). This work is done both in groups and individually. Teaching occurs on request (e.g. expert help) and is tailored to the current need of the students. |
||
2.4 Attitudes, thought, and learning |
|
|
X
|
Although the work in general takes place in a group, individual students are responsible for different parts / subsystems. Reflection on thinking and learning is required to acquire new knowledge in order to solve the project task. |
||
2.5 Ethics, equity, and other responsibilities |
X
|
|
X
|
The supervisor assists the students and the project manager in making the individual's role in the group work visible. All students are assigned individual responsibilities in the project. Examined indirectly through the outcome and implementation of the project. |
||
3. INTERPERSONAL SKILLS: TEAMWORK AND COMMUNICATION | ||||||
3.1 Teamwork |
|
|
X
|
Project work in group. |
||
3.2 Communications |
X
|
X
|
X
|
94/5000 Project work in group and communication with customer / client. Presentation of project results. |
||
3.3 Communication in foreign languages |
|
|
X
|
Course language English |
||
4. CONCEIVING, DESIGNING, IMPLEMENTING AND OPERATING SYSTEMS IN THE ENTERPRISE, SOCIETAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTEXT | ||||||
4.1 External, societal, and environmental context |
X
|
X
|
X
|
UPG1
|
Entrepreneurship |
|
4.2 Enterprise and business context |
X
|
X
|
X
|
UPG1
|
Entrepreneurship |
|
4.3 Conceiving, system engineering and management |
X
|
X
|
X
|
UPG1
|
Entrepreneurship, project planning and project report with reflections on the social need for medical technology. |
|
4.4 Designing |
|
|
X
|
The project work usually contains design elements. |
||
4.5 Implementing |
|
|
X
|
The project usually includes the realization of product prototypes. |
||
4.6 Operating |
X
|
|
X
|
The project includes delivery of a functioning system (according to a test specification) to the customer, the production of a user manual and training of the customer. |
||
5. PLANNING, EXECUTION AND PRESENTATION OF RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH RESPECT TO SCIENTIFIC AND SOCIETAL NEEDS AND REQUIREMENTS | ||||||
5.1 Societal conditions, including economic, social, and ecological aspects of sustainable development for knowledge development |
X
|
|
X
|
Project planning and project report with reflections on the social need for medical technology. |
||
5.2 Economic conditions for knowledge development |
|
|
|
|||
5.3 Identification of needs, structuring and planning of research or development projects |
X
|
X
|
X
|
UPG1
|
Entrepreneurship and project planning. |
|
5.4 Execution of research or development projects |
X
|
X
|
X
|
UPG1
|
Entrepreneurship and project work. |
|
5.5 Presentation and evaluation of research or development projects |
X
|
|
X
|
Project presentation and reflection document. |
This tab contains public material from the course room in Lisam. The information published here is not legally binding, such material can be found under the other tabs on this page.
There are no files available for this course.