Corporate Social Responsibility, 6 credits
Corporate Social Responsibility, 6 hp
TEIO41
Main field of study
Industrial Engineering and ManagementCourse level
Second cycleCourse type
Programme courseExaminer
Solmaz Filiz KarabagDirector of studies or equivalent
Anna YströmEducation components
Preliminary scheduled hours: 30 hRecommended self-study hours: 130 h
Available for exchange students
YesMain field of study
Industrial Engineering and ManagementCourse level
Second cycleAdvancement level
A1NCourse offered for
- Master of Science in Design and Product Development
- Master of Science in Energy - Environment - Management
- Master of Science in Industrial Engineering and Management
- Master of Science in Mechanical Engineering
- Master of Science in Industrial Engineering and Management - International
- Master's Programme in Industrial Engineering and Management
Prerequisites
Courses passed in organization theory, industrial management or similar courses such as introduction to business.Intended learning outcomes
The overall purpose of the course is for students to acquire knowledge and critical thinking about corporate social responsibilities.
Upon successfully finishing this course, students should be able to
- Describe and discuss corporate social responsibility (CSR) theories and concepts, and relate them to general organization theories.
- Explain the rationale, internal as well as external, for developing CSR programs
- Analyze CSR issues from different and or multi-stakeholder perspectives
- Critically evaluate CSR programs of selected firms, relate them to current challenges and suggest improvements.
Course content
- What is CSR? The major concepts and theories of corporate social responsibility: The interrelation between firms and stakeholders
- Firm practices such as human resource management and supply chain management as drivers and challengers of corporate social responsibility
- External forces as drivers of corporate social responsibility
- CSR programs and practices at leading corporations, and criticize and analyze them
Teaching and working methods
The teaching activities are organized in lectures, seminars and case discussions. The seminars and cases are based on the students own active preparations, presentations and discussions. Individual and group assignments, in addition to teaching activities, support learning outcomes.
Examination
UPG4 | Group assignments | 2 credits | U, 3, 4, 5 |
UPG3 | Individual assignments | 2 credits | U, 3, 4, 5 |
UPG6 | Preparation and participation in practical exercises and case studies | 2 credits | U, G |
To pass the course, students are required to get a Pass grade on all assignments and to attend compulsory lectures and seminars.
The final grading is based on the assessment of UPG3 and UPG4.
Students who get a fail grade on any assignment will get one opportunity during the course to revise that assignment to try to get a pass grade (no higher grade than 3). However, it is not allowed to revise assignments with pass grades in order to receive a higher grade.
Grades
Four-grade scale, LiU, U, 3, 4, 5Other information
About teaching and examination language
The teaching language is presented in the Overview tab for each course. The examination language relates to the teaching language as follows:
- If teaching language is “Swedish”, the course as a whole could be given in Swedish, or partly in English. Examination language is Swedish, but parts of the examination can be in English.
- If teaching language is “English”, the course as a whole is taught in English. Examination language is English.
- If teaching language is “Swedish/English”, the course as a whole will be taught in English if students without prior knowledge of the Swedish language participate. Examination language is Swedish or English depending on teaching language.
Other
The course is conducted in such a way that there are equal opportunities with regard to sex, transgender identity or expression, ethnicity, religion or other belief, disability, sexual orientation and age.
The planning and implementation of a course should correspond to the course syllabus. The course evaluation should therefore be conducted with the course syllabus as a starting point.
The course is campus-based at the location specified for the course, unless otherwise stated under “Teaching and working methods”. Please note, in a campus-based course occasional remote sessions could be included.
Department
Institutionen för ekonomisk och industriell utvecklingCourse literature
Other
Articles and supporting material announced on LISAM.
Code | Name | Scope | Grading scale |
---|---|---|---|
UPG4 | Group assignments | 2 credits | U, 3, 4, 5 |
UPG3 | Individual assignments | 2 credits | U, 3, 4, 5 |
UPG6 | Preparation and participation in practical exercises and case studies | 2 credits | U, G |
To pass the course, students are required to get a Pass grade on all assignments and to attend compulsory lectures and seminars.
The final grading is based on the assessment of UPG3 and UPG4.
Students who get a fail grade on any assignment will get one opportunity during the course to revise that assignment to try to get a pass grade (no higher grade than 3). However, it is not allowed to revise assignments with pass grades in order to receive a higher grade.
Course syllabus
A syllabus must be established for each course. The syllabus specifies the aim and contents of the course, and the prior knowledge that a student must have in order to be able to benefit from the course.
Timetabling
Program courses are timetabled after a decision has been made for this course concerning its assignment to a timetable module. Single subject courses can be timetabled at other times.
Interruption in and deregistration from a course
The LiU decision, Guidelines concerning confirmation of participation in education, Dnr LiU-2020-02256 (https://styrdokument.liu.se/Regelsamling/VisaBeslut/764582), states that interruptions in study are to be recorded in Ladok. Thus, all students who do not participate in a course for which they have registered are therefore obliged to report the interruption so that this can be noted in Ladok. Deregistration from or interrupting a course is carried out using a Web-based form.
Cancelled courses and changes to the course syllabus
Courses with few participants (fewer than 10) may be cancelled or organised in a manner that differs from that stated in the course syllabus. The Dean is to deliberate and decide whether a course is to be cancelled or changed from the course syllabus. For single subject courses, the cancellation must be done before students are admitted to the course (in accordance with LiUs regulation Dnr LiU-2022-01200, https://styrdokument.liu.se/Regelsamling/VisaBeslut/622645).
Guidelines relating to examinations and examiners
For details, see Guidelines for education and examination for first-cycle and second-cycle education at Linköping University, Dnr LiU-2023-00379 (http://styrdokument.liu.se/Regelsamling/VisaBeslut/917592).
An examiner must be employed as a teacher at LiU according to the LiU Regulations for Appointments, Dnr LiU-2022-04445 (https://styrdokument.liu.se/Regelsamling/VisaBeslut/622784). For courses in second-cycle, the following teachers can be appointed as examiner: Professor (including Adjunct and Visiting Professor), Associate Professor (including Adjunct), Senior Lecturer (including Adjunct and Visiting Senior Lecturer), Research Fellow, or Postdoc. For courses in first-cycle, Assistant Lecturer (including Adjunct and Visiting Assistant Lecturer) can also be appointed as examiner in addition to those listed for second-cycle courses. In exceptional cases, a Part-time Lecturer can also be appointed as an examiner at both first- and second cycle, see Delegation of authority for the Board of Faculty of Science and Engineering.
Forms of examination
Principles for examination
Written and oral examinations and digital and computer-based examinations are held at least three times a year: once immediately after the end of the course, once in August, and once (usually) in one of the re-examination periods. Examinations held at other times are to follow a decision of the faculty programme board.
Principles for examination scheduling for courses that follow the study periods:
- courses given in VT1 are examined for the first time in March, with re-examination in June and August
- courses given in VT2 are examined for the first time in May, with re-examination in August and January
- courses given in HT1 are examined for the first time in October, with re-examination in January and August
- courses given in HT2 are examined for the first time in January, with re-examination in March and in August.
The examination schedule is based on the structure of timetable modules, but there may be deviations from this, mainly in the case of courses that are studied and examined for several programmes and in lower grades (i.e. 1 and 2).
Examinations for courses that the faculty programme board has decided are to be held in alternate years are held three times during the school year in which the course is given according to the principles stated above.
Examinations for courses that are cancelled or rescheduled such that they are not given in one or several years are held three times during the year that immediately follows the course, with examination scheduling that corresponds to the scheduling that was in force before the course was cancelled or rescheduled.
When a course, or a written or oral examination (TEN, DIT, DAT, MUN), is given for the last time, the regular examination and two re-examinations will be offered. Thereafter, examinations are phased out by offering three examinations during the following academic year at the same times as the examinations in any substitute course. The exception is courses given in the period HT1, where the three examination occasions are January, March and August. If there is no substitute course, three examinations will be offered during re-examination periods during the following academic year. Other examination times are decided by the faculty programme board. In all cases above, the examination is also offered one more time during the academic year after the following, unless the faculty programme board decides otherwise. In total, 6 re-examinations are offered, of which 2 are regular re-examinations. In the examination registration system, the examinations given for the penultimate time and the last time are denoted.
If a course is given during several periods of the year (for programmes, or on different occasions for different programmes) the faculty programme board or boards determine together the scheduling and frequency of re-examination occasions.
For single subject courses, written and oral examinations can be held at other times.
Retakes of other forms of examination
Regulations concerning retakes of other forms of examination than written examinations and digital and computer-based examinations are given in the LiU guidelines for examinations and examiners, Dnr LiU-2023-00379 (http://styrdokument.liu.se/Regelsamling/VisaBeslut/917592).
Course closure
For Decision on Routines for Administration of the Discontinuation of Educational Programs, Freestanding Courses and Courses in Programs, see Dnr LiU-2021-04782 (https://styrdokument.liu.se/Regelsamling/VisaBeslut/1156410). After a decision on closure and after the end of the discontinuation period, the students are referred to a replacement course (or similar) according to information in the course syllabus or programme syllabus. If a student has passed some part/parts of a closed program course but not all, and there is an at least partially replacing course, an assessment of crediting can be made. For questions about the crediting of course components, contact the Study councellors.
Registration for examination
In order to take an written, digital or computer-based examination, registration in advance is mandatory, see decision in the university’s rule book Dnr LiU-2020-04559 (https://styrdokument.liu.se/Regelsamling/VisaBeslut/622682). An unregistered student can thus not be offered a place. The registration is done at the Student Portal or in the LiU-app during the registration period. The registration period opens 30 days before the date of the examination and closes 10 days before the date of the examination. Candidates are informed of the location of the examination by email, four days in advance.
Code of conduct for students during examinations
Details are given in a decision in the university’s rule book, Dnr LiU-2020-04559 (http://styrdokument.liu.se/Regelsamling/VisaBeslut/622682).
Retakes for higher grade
Students at the Institute of Technology at LiU have the right to retake written examinations and digital and computer-based examinations in an attempt to achieve a higher grade. This is valid for all examination components with code “TEN”, “DIT” and "DAT". The same right may not be exercised for other examination components, unless otherwise specified in the course syllabus.
A retake is not possible on courses that are included in an issued degree diploma.
Grades
The grades that are preferably to be used are Fail (U), Pass (3), Pass not without distinction (4) and Pass with distinction (5).
- Grades U, 3, 4, 5 are to be awarded for courses that have written or digital examinations.
- Grades Fail (U) and Pass (G) may be awarded for courses with a large degree of practical components such as laboratory work, project work and group work.
- Grades Fail (U) and Pass (G) are to be used for degree projects and other independent work.
Examination components
The following examination components and associated module codes are used at the Faculty of Science and Engineering:
- Grades U, 3, 4, 5 are to be awarded for written examinations (TEN) and digital examinations (DIT).
- Examination components for which the grades Fail (U) and Pass (G) may be awarded are laboratory work (LAB), project work (PRA), preparatory written examination (KTR), digital preparatory written examination (DIK), oral examination (MUN), computer-based examination in a computer lab (DAT), digital preparatory written examination in a computer lab (DAK), home assignment (HEM), and assignment (UPG).
- Students receive grades either Fail (U) or Pass (G) for other examination components in which the examination criteria are satisfied principally through active attendance such as tutorial group (BAS) or examination item (MOM).
- Grades Fail (U) and Pass (G) are to be used for the examination components Opposition (OPPO) and Attendance at thesis presentation (AUSK) (i.e. part of the degree project).
In general, the following applies:
- Mandatory course components must be scored and given a module code.
- Examination components that are not scored, cannot be mandatory. Hence, it is voluntary to participate in these examinations, and the voluntariness must be clearly stated. Additionally, if there are any associated conditions to the examination component, these must be clearly stated as well.
- For courses with more than one examination component with grades U,3,4,5, it shall be clearly stated how the final grade is weighted.
For mandatory components, the following applies (in accordance with the LiU Guidelines for education and examination for first-cycle and second-cycle education at Linköping University, Dnr LiU-2023-00379 http://styrdokument.liu.se/Regelsamling/VisaBeslut/917592):
- If special circumstances prevail, and if it is possible with consideration of the nature of the compulsory component, the examiner may decide to replace the compulsory component with another equivalent component.
For possibilities to alternative forms of examinations, the following applies (in accordance with the LiU Guidelines for education and examination for first-cycle and second-cycle education at Linköping University, Dnr LiU-2023-00379 http://styrdokument.liu.se/Regelsamling/VisaBeslut/917592):
- If the LiU coordinator for students with disabilities has granted a student the right to an adapted examination for a written examination in an examination hall, the student has the right to it.
- If the coordinator has recommended for the student an adapted examination or alternative form of examination, the examiner may grant this if the examiner assesses that it is possible, based on consideration of the course objectives.
- An examiner may also decide that an adapted examination or alternative form of examination if the examiner assessed that special circumstances prevail, and the examiner assesses that it is possible while maintaing the objectives of the course.
Reporting of examination results
The examination results for a student are reported at the relevant department.
Plagiarism
For examinations that involve the writing of reports, in cases in which it can be assumed that the student has had access to other sources (such as during project work, writing essays, etc.), the material submitted must be prepared in accordance with principles for acceptable practice when referring to sources (references or quotations for which the source is specified) when the text, images, ideas, data, etc. of other people are used. It is also to be made clear whether the author has reused his or her own text, images, ideas, data, etc. from previous examinations, such as degree projects, project reports, etc. (this is sometimes known as “self-plagiarism”).
A failure to specify such sources may be regarded as attempted deception during examination.
Attempts to cheat
In the event of a suspected attempt by a student to cheat during an examination, or when study performance is to be assessed as specified in Chapter 10 of the Higher Education Ordinance, the examiner is to report this to the disciplinary board of the university. Possible consequences for the student are suspension from study and a formal warning. More information is available at Cheating, deception and plagiarism.
Linköping University has also produced a guide for teachers and students' use of generative AI in education (Dnr LiU-2023-02660). As a student, you are always expected to gain knowledge of what applies to each course (including the degree project). In general, clarity to where and how generative AI has been used is important.
Regulations (apply to LiU in its entirety)
The university is a government agency whose operations are regulated by legislation and ordinances, which include the Higher Education Act and the Higher Education Ordinance. In addition to legislation and ordinances, operations are subject to several policy documents. The Linköping University rule book collects currently valid decisions of a regulatory nature taken by the university board, the vice-chancellor and faculty/department boards.
LiU’s rule book for education at first-cycle and second-cycle levels is available at https://styrdokument.liu.se/Regelsamling/Innehall.
Other
Articles and supporting material announced on LISAM.
Note: The course matrix might contain more information in Swedish.
I | U | A | Modules | Comment | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. DISCIPLINARY KNOWLEDGE AND REASONING | ||||||
1.1 Knowledge of underlying mathematics and science (G1X level) |
|
|
|
|||
1.2 Fundamental engineering knowledge (G1X level) |
|
|
X
|
The course is built on organizational theory and technology firms related knowledge |
||
1.3 Further knowledge, methods, and tools in one or several subjects in engineering or natural science (G2X level) |
X
|
X
|
X
|
UPG3
UPG4
UPG6
|
Corporate social responsibility (CSR) theories and concepts, and relate them to general organization theories; T: Multi-stakeholder perspectives |
|
1.4 Advanced knowledge, methods, and tools in one or several subjects in engineering or natural sciences (A1X level) |
|
X
|
|
UPG3
UPG4
UPG6
|
Analysis of multi-stakeholder and business ecosystem's actor by case analysis |
|
1.5 Insight into current research and development work |
X
|
X
|
X
|
UPG3
UPG4
UPG6
|
Case articles and descriptions |
|
2. PERSONAL AND PROFESSIONAL SKILLS AND ATTRIBUTES | ||||||
2.1 Analytical reasoning and problem solving |
|
X
|
|
UPG3
UPG6
|
The course ,uses several cases and analyze them during the case seminars. Based on debating during those seminars, reading scientific articles and reflection report; corporate social responsibility (CSR) theories and concepts, and relate them to general organization theories; Explain the rational of developing CSR, analyzing and critically assessing CSR issues |
|
2.2 Experimentation, investigation, and knowledge discovery |
|
X
|
|
UPG4
UPG6
|
Critically use and analyze scientific papers and a contemporary CSR issue |
|
2.3 System thinking |
|
X
|
X
|
UPG3
UPG4
UPG6
|
Critically analyzing CSR cases by using scientific papers, |
|
2.4 Attitudes, thought, and learning |
X
|
X
|
X
|
UPG3
UPG6
|
Case analyses & Reflection report on cases analysis & actively joining debate and role-playing. |
|
2.5 Ethics, equity, and other responsibilities |
X
|
X
|
X
|
UPG3
UPG4
UPG6
|
Cases analyses & Contemporary CSR analysis |
|
3. INTERPERSONAL SKILLS: TEAMWORK AND COMMUNICATION | ||||||
3.1 Teamwork |
|
X
|
|
UPG4
UPG6
|
Preparation for and debating cases analysis, Analyzing Contemporary CSR analysis |
|
3.2 Communications |
|
X
|
X
|
UPG3
UPG4
UPG6
|
Debating: Preparation and active participation in practical exercises and case studies; Debating in written form: Reflection Report; Presenting: Contemporary CSR issues |
|
3.3 Communication in foreign languages |
|
|
X
|
UPG3
UPG4
UPG6
|
English |
|
4. CONCEIVING, DESIGNING, IMPLEMENTING AND OPERATING SYSTEMS IN THE ENTERPRISE, SOCIETAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTEXT | ||||||
4.1 External, societal, and environmental context |
|
X
|
X
|
UPG3
UPG4
UPG6
|
Develop an in-depth and critical understanding of organizational responsibility by case analyses and a study of contemporary issues |
|
4.2 Enterprise and business context |
|
X
|
X
|
UPG3
UPG4
UPG6
|
Case analyses and analysis of contemporary issues |
|
4.3 Conceiving, system engineering and management |
|
X
|
X
|
UPG3
UPG4
UPG6
|
Explain the rationale for developing CSR programs; Analyze CSR issues from different and or multi-stakeholder perspectives; Critically evaluate CSR programs of selected firms. |
|
4.4 Designing |
|
|
|
|||
4.5 Implementing |
|
X
|
|
UPG3
UPG6
|
Case analysis to understand responsible innovation, supply chain management and environmental management |
|
4.6 Operating |
|
|
|
|||
5. PLANNING, EXECUTION AND PRESENTATION OF RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH RESPECT TO SCIENTIFIC AND SOCIETAL NEEDS AND REQUIREMENTS | ||||||
5.1 Societal conditions, including economic, social, and ecological aspects of sustainable development for knowledge development |
|
|
|
|||
5.2 Economic conditions for knowledge development |
|
|
|
|||
5.3 Identification of needs, structuring and planning of research or development projects |
X
|
|
|
Responsible innovation, and Responsible Supply Chain, Responsible Environment Management and Corruption Management are analyzed. During these analyses the students develop ideas and plans to show how firm can be more responsible |
||
5.4 Execution of research or development projects |
X
|
|
|
Responsible innovation, and Responsible Supply Chain, Responsible Environment Management and Corruption Management are analyzed. During these analyses the students develop ideas and plans to show how firm can be more responsible. Contemporary CSR issue might focus of developing CSR plan |
||
5.5 Presentation and evaluation of research or development projects |
X
|
|
|
By reading selection of articles for the case analysis |
This tab contains public material from the course room in Lisam. The information published here is not legally binding, such material can be found under the other tabs on this page.
There are no files available for this course.