Entrepreneurship and idea development in a service-based sector, 6 credits

Entreprenörskap och idéutveckling i en tjänstebaserad bransch, 6 hp

TEIO98

Main field of study

No main field of study

Course level

First cycle

Course type

Programme course

Examiner

Charlotte Norrman

Director of studies or equivalent

Dzamila Bienkowska

Education components

Preliminary scheduled hours: 44 h
Recommended self-study hours: 116 h
ECV = Elective / Compulsory / Voluntary
Course offered for Semester Period Timetable module Language Campus ECV
6KDJP Animal psychology, Bachelor's Programme 3 (Autumn 2022) 2 2 Swedish Linköping, Valla C

Main field of study

No main field of study

Course level

First cycle

Advancement level

G1X

Specific information

The course cannot be included in the same degree as TEIO95, TEIO94, TEIO06 or TEIO20. 

Course offered for

  • Bachelor's Programme in Animal psychology

Prerequisites

The course requires that the student can search for and structure information independently, use scientific literature in simple analyses of cases, discuss and communicate orally and in writing, plan and carry out project work in groups and have some ability to think critically and creatively.

Intended learning outcomes

The course aims to give participants a basic orientation in entrepreneurship and service-based business linked to their own future field. After completing the course, the student should:

  • be able to discuss and define the concepts of entrepreneurship and innovation in general and in relation to their main area of knowledge or profession,
  • at a basic level, be able to describe and discuss the context and conditions for entrepreneurship and service-based business within their professional area,
  • be able to describe issues that make up a business idea and be able to analyse a business from a theoretical perspective,
  • be able to discuss and define the concept of service logic and have a basic ability to apply theoretical tools in practice when describing their own potential business idea,
  • have some ability to communicate a proposal for a business idea in writing, in the form of an Idea PM, and orally, in the form of so-called idea pitches.

Course content

The course contains three themes:

  • Entrepreneurship and innovation - The student is faced with different perspectives on entrepreneurship and innovation. Here we also ask ourselves what an entrepreneurial and an innovative business is or can be and in what contexts they may exist.
  • Service-based business - The student analyses existing service-based activities from different perspectives.
  • Service-based idea development - The student practices the process of developing a service-based idea into a business. Here the focus is on how to formulate and develop an idea on which you can build a new business or further develop an existing one.

Teaching and working methods

The course includes lectures, guest lectures, lessons / workshops, own reading, work in pairs and in groups as well as presentations - so-called pitches. The context for the course is service-based ideas linked to the fields of biology and animal behaviour. The theoretical lectures explain, together with the literature, concepts and models in the field of entrepreneurship and business development, which are then applied through various tasks to the context of the program where the course is included. Relevance in teaching is important and therefore we strive to get close to reality by analysing other organisations as well as our own ideas. Research shows that active learning facilitates and increases knowledge acquisition and to support this, several different forms of learning are used in the course. The course therefore presupposes that the students take responsibility for their own learning, both individually and in groups. 

The course is given once a year.

Examination

UPG1Individual and pairwise reflections3 creditsU, G
UPG2Project work in groups3 creditsU, G

UPG1 consists of two reflection tasks where the student / students, with the support of research and business development literature, reflect on the course themes. The first assignment focuses on the course's first theme - the concepts of entrepreneurship and innovation, linked to activities within the student's own area of knowledge. The second reflection aims at increasing the understanding of the course's second theme - service-based entrepreneurship within the focus area of the programme. In both cases, students will discuss and comment on each other's tasks.

UPG2 focuses on the third theme - service-based idea development - and consists of a small project work in a group where students work on developing and evaluating their own idea, which is reported in writing in an idea-PM. The assignment also includes an oral presentation in the form of a so-called pitch.

To pass the course, a passing grade for all examination parts is required, as well as attendance at compulsory activities such as certain seminars and presentations. Details of the course structure and implementation, including descriptions of all compulsory elements and assignments, are presented in a PM that is communicated to the students at the beginning of the course.

Grades are given as ‘Fail’ or ‘Pass’.

Grades

Two-grade scale, U, G

Other information

About teaching and examination language

The teaching language is presented in the Overview tab for each course. The examination language relates to the teaching language as follows: 

  • If teaching language is “Swedish”, the course as a whole could be given in Swedish, or partly in English. Examination language is Swedish, but parts of the examination can be in English.
  • If teaching language is “English”, the course as a whole is taught in English. Examination language is English.
  • If teaching language is “Swedish/English”, the course as a whole will be taught in English if students without prior knowledge of the Swedish language participate. Examination language is Swedish or English depending on teaching language.

Other

The course is conducted in a manner where both men's and women's experience and knowledge are made visible and developed. 

The planning and implementation of a course should correspond to the course syllabus. The course evaluation should therefore be conducted with the course syllabus as a starting point.  

If special circumstances prevail, the vice-chancellor may in a special decision specify the preconditions for temporary deviations from this course syllabus, and delegate the right to take such decisions.

Department

Institutionen för ekonomisk och industriell utveckling

Course literature

Books

  • Frankelius, Per, Norrman, Charlotte, (2013) Uppfinningars betydelse för Sverige : hur kan den svenska innovationskraften utvecklas och tas tillvara bättre? Stockholm : VINNOVA, 2013
    ISBN: 9789186517830, 16503104, 16503104
  • Kristensson, Per, Witell, Lars, Gustafsson, Anders, (2014) Tjänsteinnovation. 1. uppl. Lund : Studentlitteratur, 2014
    ISBN: 9789144095127
  • McKinsey, (1998) Från idé till företag. Affärsplanering för framgång. McKinsey & Company, Göteborg och Stockholm.

Articles


  • Scientific articles and book chapters, case descriptions, etc presented at the course home page.
Code Name Scope Grading scale
UPG1 Individual and pairwise reflections 3 credits U, G
UPG2 Project work in groups 3 credits U, G

UPG1 consists of two reflection tasks where the student / students, with the support of research and business development literature, reflect on the course themes. The first assignment focuses on the course's first theme - the concepts of entrepreneurship and innovation, linked to activities within the student's own area of knowledge. The second reflection aims at increasing the understanding of the course's second theme - service-based entrepreneurship within the focus area of the programme. In both cases, students will discuss and comment on each other's tasks.

UPG2 focuses on the third theme - service-based idea development - and consists of a small project work in a group where students work on developing and evaluating their own idea, which is reported in writing in an idea-PM. The assignment also includes an oral presentation in the form of a so-called pitch.

To pass the course, a passing grade for all examination parts is required, as well as attendance at compulsory activities such as certain seminars and presentations. Details of the course structure and implementation, including descriptions of all compulsory elements and assignments, are presented in a PM that is communicated to the students at the beginning of the course.

Grades are given as ‘Fail’ or ‘Pass’.

Course syllabus

A syllabus must be established for each course. The syllabus specifies the aim and contents of the course, and the prior knowledge that a student must have in order to be able to benefit from the course.

Timetabling

Courses are timetabled after a decision has been made for this course concerning its assignment to a timetable module. 

Interruption in and deregistration from a course

The LiU decision, Guidelines concerning confirmation of participation in education (Dnr LiU-2020-02256), states that interruptions in study are to be recorded in Ladok. Thus, all students who do not participate in a course for which they have registered must record the interruption, such that the registration on the course can be removed. Deregistration from or interrupting a course is carried out using a web-based form Forms

Cancelled courses and changes to the course syllabus

Courses with few participants (fewer than 10) may be cancelled or organised in a manner that differs from that stated in the course syllabus. The Dean is to deliberate and decide whether a course is to be cancelled or changed from the course syllabus. 

Guidelines relating to examinations and examiners 

For details, see Guidelines for education and examination for first-cycle and second-cycle education at Linköping University, Dnr LiU-2020-04501  (http://styrdokument.liu.se/Regelsamling/VisaBeslut/917592).

An examiner must be employed as a teacher at LiU according to the LiU Regulations for Appointments, Dnr LiU-2021-01204 (https://styrdokument.liu.se/Regelsamling/VisaBeslut/622784). For courses in second-cycle, the following teachers can be appointed as examiner: Professor (including Adjunct and Visiting Professor), Associate Professor (including Adjunct), Senior Lecturer (including Adjunct and Visiting Senior Lecturer), Research Fellow, or Postdoc. For courses in first-cycle, Assistant Lecturer (including Adjunct and Visiting Assistant Lecturer) can also be appointed as examiner in addition to those listed for second-cycle courses. In exceptional cases, a Part-time Lecturer can also be appointed as an examiner at both first- and second cycle, see Delegation of authority for the Board of Faculty of Science and Engineering.

Forms of examination

Principles for examination

Written and oral examinations and digital and computer-based examinations are held at least three times a year: once immediately after the end of the course, once in August, and once (usually) in one of the re-examination periods. Examinations held at other times are to follow a decision of the faculty programme board.

Principles for examination scheduling for courses that follow the study periods:

  • courses given in VT1 are examined for the first time in March, with re-examination in June and August
  • courses given in VT2 are examined for the first time in May, with re-examination in August and January
  • courses given in HT1 are examined for the first time in October, with re-examination in January and August
  • courses given in HT2 are examined for the first time in January, with re-examination in March and in August.

The examination schedule is based on the structure of timetable modules, but there may be deviations from this, mainly in the case of courses that are studied and examined for several programmes and in lower grades (i.e. 1 and 2). 

Examinations for courses that the faculty programme board has decided are to be held in alternate years are held three times during the school year in which the course is given according to the principles stated above.

Examinations for courses that are cancelled or rescheduled such that they are not given in one or several years are held three times during the year that immediately follows the course, with examination scheduling that corresponds to the scheduling that was in force before the course was cancelled or rescheduled.

When a course, or a written examination (TEN, DIT, DAT), is given for the last time, the regular examination and two re-examinations will be offered. Thereafter, examinations are phased out by offering three examinations during the following academic year at the same times as the examinations in any substitute course. If there is no substitute course, three examinations will be offered during re-examination periods during the following academic year. Other examination times are decided by the faculty programme board. In all cases above, the examination is also offered one more time during the academic year after the following, unless the faculty programme board decides otherwise. In total, 6 re-examinations are offered, of which 2 are regular re-examinations. In the examination registration system, the examinations given for the penultimate time and the last time are denoted. 

If a course is given during several periods of the year (for programmes, or on different occasions for different programmes) the faculty programme board or boards determine together the scheduling and frequency of re-examination occasions.

Retakes of other forms of examination

Regulations concerning retakes of other forms of examination than written examinations and digital and computer-based examinations are given in the LiU guidelines for examinations and examiners, http://styrdokument.liu.se/Regelsamling/VisaBeslut/917592.

Course closure

For Decision on Routines for Administration of the Discontinuation of Educational Programs, Freestanding Courses and Courses in Programs, see DNR LiU-2021-04782. After a decision on closure and after the end of the discontinuation period, the students are referred to a replacement course (or similar) according to information in the course syllabus or programme syllabus. If a student has passed some part/parts of a closed program course but not all, and there is an at least partially replacing course, an assessment of crediting can be made. Any crediting of course components is made by the examiner.

Registration for examination

In order to take an written, digital or computer-based examination, registration in advance is mandatory, see decision in the university’s rule book https://styrdokument.liu.se/Regelsamling/VisaBeslut/622682. An unregistered student can thus not be offered a place. The registration is done at the Student Portal or in the LiU-app during the registration period. The registration period opens 30 days before the date of the examination and closes 10 days before the date of the examination. Candidates are informed of the location of the examination by email, four days in advance. 

Code of conduct for students during examinations

Details are given in a decision in the university’s rule book: http://styrdokument.liu.se/Regelsamling/VisaBeslut/622682.

Retakes for higher grade

Students at the Institute of Technology at LiU have the right to retake written examinations and digital and computer-based examinations in an attempt to achieve a higher grade. This is valid for all examination components with code “TEN”, “DIT” and "DAT". The same right may not be exercised for other examination components, unless otherwise specified in the course syllabus.

A retake is not possible on courses that are included in an issued degree diploma. 

Grades

The grades that are preferably to be used are Fail (U), Pass (3), Pass not without distinction (4) and Pass with distinction (5). 

  • Grades U, 3, 4, 5 are to be awarded for courses that have written or digital examinations.
  • Grades Fail (U) and Pass (G) may be awarded for courses with a large degree of practical components such as laboratory work, project work and group work.
  • Grades Fail (U) and Pass (G) are to be used for degree projects and other independent work.

Examination components

The following examination components and associated module codes are used at the Faculty of Science and Engineering:

  • Grades U, 3, 4, 5 are to be awarded for written examinations (TEN) and digital examinations (DIT).
  • Examination components for which the grades Fail (U) and Pass (G) may be awarded are laboratory work (LAB), project work (PRA), preparatory written examination (KTR), digital preparatory written examination (DIK), oral examination (MUN), computer-based examination (DAT), home assignment (HEM), and assignment (UPG).
  • Students receive grades either Fail (U) or Pass (G) for other examination components in which the examination criteria are satisfied principally through active attendance such as tutorial group (BAS) or examination item (MOM).
  • Grades Fail (U) and Pass (G) are to be used for the examination components Opposition (OPPO) and Attendance at thesis presentation (AUSK) (i.e. part of the degree project).

In general, the following applies:

  • Mandatory course components must be scored and given a module code.
  • Examination components that are not scored, cannot be mandatory. Hence, it is voluntary to participate in these examinations, and the voluntariness must be clearly stated. Additionally, if there are any associated conditions to the examination component, these must be clearly stated as well.
  • For courses with more than one examination component with grades U,3,4,5, it shall be clearly stated how the final grade is weighted.

For mandatory components, the following applies (in accordance with the LiU Guidelines for education and examination for first-cycle and second-cycle education at Linköping University, http://styrdokument.liu.se/Regelsamling/VisaBeslut/917592): 

  • If special circumstances prevail, and if it is possible with consideration of the nature of the compulsory component, the examiner may decide to replace the compulsory component with another equivalent component.

For possibilities to alternative forms of examinations, the following applies (in accordance with the LiU Guidelines for education and examination for first-cycle and second-cycle education at Linköping University, http://styrdokument.liu.se/Regelsamling/VisaBeslut/917592): 

  • If the LiU coordinator for students with disabilities has granted a student the right to an adapted examination for a written examination in an examination hall, the student has the right to it.
  • If the coordinator has recommended for the student an adapted examination or alternative form of examination, the examiner may grant this if the examiner assesses that it is possible, based on consideration of the course objectives.
  • An examiner may also decide that an adapted examination or alternative form of examination if the examiner assessed that special circumstances prevail, and the examiner assesses that it is possible while maintaing the objectives of the course.

Reporting of examination results

The examination results for a student are reported at the relevant department.

Plagiarism

For examinations that involve the writing of reports, in cases in which it can be assumed that the student has had access to other sources (such as during project work, writing essays, etc.), the material submitted must be prepared in accordance with principles for acceptable practice when referring to sources (references or quotations for which the source is specified) when the text, images, ideas, data, etc. of other people are used. It is also to be made clear whether the author has reused his or her own text, images, ideas, data, etc. from previous examinations, such as degree projects, project reports, etc. (this is sometimes known as “self-plagiarism”).

A failure to specify such sources may be regarded as attempted deception during examination.

Attempts to cheat

In the event of a suspected attempt by a student to cheat during an examination, or when study performance is to be assessed as specified in Chapter 10 of the Higher Education Ordinance, the examiner is to report this to the disciplinary board of the university. Possible consequences for the student are suspension from study and a formal warning. More information is available at Cheating, deception and plagiarism 

Regulations (apply to LiU in its entirety)

The university is a government agency whose operations are regulated by legislation and ordinances, which include the Higher Education Act and the Higher Education Ordinance. In addition to legislation and ordinances, operations are subject to several policy documents. The Linköping University rule book collects currently valid decisions of a regulatory nature taken by the university board, the vice-chancellor and faculty/department boards.

LiU’s rule book for education at first-cycle and second-cycle levels is available at http://styrdokument.liu.se/Regelsamling/Innehall/Utbildning_pa_grund-_och_avancerad_niva

Books

Frankelius, Per, Norrman, Charlotte, (2013) Uppfinningars betydelse för Sverige : hur kan den svenska innovationskraften utvecklas och tas tillvara bättre? Stockholm : VINNOVA, 2013

ISBN: 9789186517830, 16503104, 16503104

Kristensson, Per, Witell, Lars, Gustafsson, Anders, (2014) Tjänsteinnovation. 1. uppl. Lund : Studentlitteratur, 2014

ISBN: 9789144095127

McKinsey, (1998) Från idé till företag. Affärsplanering för framgång. McKinsey & Company, Göteborg och Stockholm.

Articles

Scientific articles and book chapters, case descriptions, etc presented at the course home page.

Note: The course matrix might contain more information in Swedish.

I = Introduce, U = Teach, A = Utilize
I U A Modules Comment
1. DISCIPLINARY KNOWLEDGE AND REASONING
1.1 Knowledge of underlying mathematics and science (G1X level)

                            
1.2 Fundamental engineering knowledge (G1X level)

                            
1.3 Further knowledge, methods, and tools in one or several subjects in engineering or natural science (G2X level)

                            
1.4 Advanced knowledge, methods, and tools in one or several subjects in engineering or natural sciences (A1X level)

                            
1.5 Insight into current research and development work
X
UPG1
UPG2

                            
2. PERSONAL AND PROFESSIONAL SKILLS AND ATTRIBUTES
2.1 Analytical reasoning and problem solving
X
X
X
UPG1
UPG2

                            
2.2 Experimentation, investigation, and knowledge discovery
X
X
X
UPG1
UPG2

                            
2.3 System thinking
X
X
X
UPG1
UPG2

                            
2.4 Attitudes, thought, and learning
X
X
UPG1
UPG2

                            
2.5 Ethics, equity, and other responsibilities
X
UPG1
UPG2

                            
3. INTERPERSONAL SKILLS: TEAMWORK AND COMMUNICATION
3.1 Teamwork
X
X
X
UPG2

                            
3.2 Communications
X
X
X
UPG1
UPG2

                            
3.3 Communication in foreign languages

                            
4. CONCEIVING, DESIGNING, IMPLEMENTING AND OPERATING SYSTEMS IN THE ENTERPRISE, SOCIETAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTEXT
4.1 External, societal, and environmental context
X

                            
4.2 Enterprise and business context
X
X
X
UPG1
UPG2

                            
4.3 Conceiving, system engineering and management
X
X
X
UPG2

                            
4.4 Designing
X
UPG2

                            
4.5 Implementing
X
UPG2

                            
4.6 Operating
X
UPG2

                            
5. PLANNING, EXECUTION AND PRESENTATION OF RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH RESPECT TO SCIENTIFIC AND SOCIETAL NEEDS AND REQUIREMENTS
5.1 Societal conditions, including economic, social, and ecological aspects of sustainable development for knowledge development
X
X
X
UPG1
UPG2

                            
5.2 Economic conditions for knowledge development
X
UPG1
UPG2

                            
5.3 Identification of needs, structuring and planning of research or development projects

                            
5.4 Execution of research or development projects

                            
5.5 Presentation and evaluation of research or development projects

                            

This tab contains public material from the course room in Lisam. The information published here is not legally binding, such material can be found under the other tabs on this page.

There are no files available for this course.