Six Sigma Quality, 6 credits
Six Sigma Quality, 6 hp
TMQU04
Main field of study
Industrial Engineering and ManagementCourse level
Second cycleCourse type
Programme courseExaminer
Peter CronemyrDirector of studies or equivalent
Björn OskarssonEducation components
Preliminary scheduled hours: 50 hRecommended self-study hours: 110 h
Available for exchange students
YesMain field of study
Industrial Engineering and ManagementCourse level
Second cycleAdvancement level
A1XCourse offered for
- Industrial Engineering and Management - International, M Sc in Engineering
- Industrial Engineering and Management, M Sc in Engineering
- Mechanical Engineering, M Sc in Engineering
- Industrial Engineering and Management, Master's programme
- Mechanical Engineering, Master's programme
- Energy-Environment-Management
Entry requirements
Note: Admission requirements for non-programme students usually also include admission requirements for the programme and threshold requirements for progression within the programme, or corresponding.
Prerequisites
Required: Mathematical statistics, Quality Management and EngineeringDesired: Statistical Quality Control.
Intended learning outcomes
The course gives knowledge about organization, working methods and tools for process and product improvements using Six Sigma methodology. The essence of Six Sigma is to define and solve advanced problems using advanced statistical and qualitative methods, but doing so in a way that results and solutions are well supported by managers and employees in the organization and process being improved. The foundation is based on scientific method, but the project-oriented approach is design to fit in an engineering environment. After completing the course, the student is able to:
- identify situations where Six Sigma methodology could give an important contribution to quality improvement with regard to product and process development within industrial and service contexts
- identify which analysis methods is suitable to solve a given problem
- carry out a Six Sigma project from defined problem and target to verified improvement according to the DMAIC process
- use both qualitative evaluations and quantitative statistical analysis and improvement methods
Course content
Understanding of variation, Evolution of Six Sigma, the DMAIC roadmap for carrying out improvement projects as well as tools for the five phases:
- DEFINE - Define problem and target (but not solution)
- MEASURE - Collect facts and data (historical/real-time) and funnel the problem
- ANALYZE - Find the hidden root causes with quantitative and qualitative methods
- IMPROVE - Carry out robust and sustainable improvements
- CONTROL - Document, train, measure and follow up and finally hand over
Teaching and working methods
The course is carried out as a Six Sigma-project according to the five phases of the DMAIC process. The theoretical elements of the course are covered in lectures, one-two per project phase. All work is done on a project basis, where max four students work in a team. All teams will get the same assignment but with different data to analyze, and hence different root causes. Each team carries out a project phase per week and will be coached/guided by a teacher once a week. Each phase ends with the submission, review and approval (if necessary after completion) of a new chapter in the project report. The project work is designed as a real project, the way it is carried out in industry or other companies using the Six Sigma process improvement methodology. Furthermore, a final project presentation in a so-called poster session in front of other students is conducted in the end of the course. A literature seminar is also conducted group wise.
Examination
KTR1 | Written Test | 0.5 credits | U, 3, 4, 5 |
UPG2 | Projects | 5.5 credits | U, 3, 4, 5 |
Each team submits five report chapters (one per DMAIC phase), which together form the project report. These are graded according to U,3,4,5 based on how well the work was done by the group and how much supervision and completion they needed. Everyone in the group gets the same average grade. The individual grades may be changed based on an individual written test. The main focus is on solving the problem in the group under as close to real circumstances as possible why the group's performance is the main basis for grading.
Grades
Four-grade scale, LiU, U, 3, 4, 5Other information
Supplementary courses:
Quality Management Course. May lead to Six Sigma Green Belt certification.
Department
Institutionen för ekonomisk och industriell utvecklingDirector of Studies or equivalent
Björn OskarssonExaminer
Peter CronemyrEducation components
Preliminary scheduled hours: 50 hRecommended self-study hours: 110 h
Course literature
Magnusson, K., Kroslid, D. and Bergman, B. (2003) Six Sigma The Pragmatic Approach, Studentlitteratur Brook, Q. (2010) Lean Six Sigma and Minitab: The Complete Toolbox Guide for All Lean Six Sigma Practitioners (3rd edition), OPEX Resources Ltd Utdelat material och artiklarCode | Name | Scope | Grading scale |
---|---|---|---|
KTR1 | Written Test | 0.5 credits | U, 3, 4, 5 |
UPG2 | Projects | 5.5 credits | U, 3, 4, 5 |
Each team submits five report chapters (one per DMAIC phase), which together form the project report. These are graded according to U,3,4,5 based on how well the work was done by the group and how much supervision and completion they needed. Everyone in the group gets the same average grade. The individual grades may be changed based on an individual written test. The main focus is on solving the problem in the group under as close to real circumstances as possible why the group's performance is the main basis for grading.
Regulations (apply to LiU in its entirety)
The university is a government agency whose operations are regulated by legislation and ordinances, which include the Higher Education Act and the Higher Education Ordinance. In addition to legislation and ordinances, operations are subject to several policy documents. The Linköping University rule book collects currently valid decisions of a regulatory nature taken by the university board, the vice-chancellor and faculty/department boards.
LiU’s rule book for education at first-cycle and second-cycle levels is available at http://styrdokument.liu.se/Regelsamling/Innehall/Utbildning_pa_grund-_och_avancerad_niva.
Note: The course matrix might contain more information in Swedish.
I | U | A | Modules | Comment | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. DISCIPLINARY KNOWLEDGE AND REASONING | ||||||
1.1 Knowledge of underlying mathematics and science (G1X level) |
|
X
|
|
UPG2
|
||
1.2 Fundamental engineering knowledge (G1X level) |
|
X
|
X
|
UPG2
|
||
1.3 Further knowledge, methods, and tools in one or several subjects in engineering or natural science (G2X level) |
|
X
|
X
|
UPG2
|
||
1.4 Advanced knowledge, methods, and tools in one or several subjects in engineering or natural sciences (A1X level) |
|
|
|
|||
1.5 Insight into current research and development work |
|
|
|
|||
2. PERSONAL AND PROFESSIONAL SKILLS AND ATTRIBUTES | ||||||
2.1 Analytical reasoning and problem solving |
|
X
|
X
|
|||
2.2 Experimentation, investigation, and knowledge discovery |
|
X
|
X
|
|||
2.3 System thinking |
|
X
|
X
|
UPG2
|
||
2.4 Attitudes, thought, and learning |
X
|
|
|
|||
2.5 Ethics, equity, and other responsibilities |
|
X
|
|
UPG2
|
||
3. INTERPERSONAL SKILLS: TEAMWORK AND COMMUNICATION | ||||||
3.1 Teamwork |
|
|
X
|
UPG2
|
||
3.2 Communications |
|
|
X
|
UPG2
|
||
3.3 Communication in foreign languages |
|
|
X
|
UPG2
|
||
4. CONCEIVING, DESIGNING, IMPLEMENTING AND OPERATING SYSTEMS IN THE ENTERPRISE, SOCIETAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTEXT | ||||||
4.1 External, societal, and environmental context |
X
|
|
|
|||
4.2 Enterprise and business context |
|
X
|
|
UPG2
|
||
4.3 Conceiving, system engineering and management |
|
X
|
|
UPG2
|
||
4.4 Designing |
|
X
|
|
UPG2
|
||
4.5 Implementing |
|
X
|
|
UPG2
|
||
4.6 Operating |
X
|
|
|
|||
5. PLANNING, EXECUTION AND PRESENTATION OF RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH RESPECT TO SCIENTIFIC AND SOCIETAL NEEDS AND REQUIREMENTS | ||||||
5.1 Societal conditions, including economic, social, and ecological aspects of sustainable development for knowledge development |
|
|
|
|||
5.2 Economic conditions for knowledge development |
|
|
|
|||
5.3 Identification of needs, structuring and planning of research or development projects |
|
X
|
|
UPG2
|
||
5.4 Execution of research or development projects |
|
X
|
|
UPG2
|
||
5.5 Presentation and evaluation of research or development projects |
X
|
|
|
This tab contains public material from the course room in Lisam. The information published here is not legally binding, such material can be found under the other tabs on this page.
There are no files available for this course.