Thinking with Representations, 6 credits
Representationer som tänkande, 6 hp
769A03
Main field of study
Cognitive ScienceCourse level
Second cycleCourse type
Single subject and programme courseExaminer
Wanjun ChuCourse coordinator
Wanjun ChuDirector of studies or equivalent
Jalal MalekiAvailable for exchange students
YesContact
Kostas Mitropoulos, international coordinator
Course offered for | Semester | Weeks | Timetable module | Language | Campus | ECV | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Single subject course (One-quarter-time, Day-time) | Spring 2022 | 202203-202222 | 2+3 | English | Linköping, Valla | ||
F7MKS | Master Programme in Cognitive Science | 2 (Spring 2022) | 202203-202222 | 2+3 | Swedish | Linköping, Valla | E |
Main field of study
Cognitive ScienceCourse level
Second cycleAdvancement level
A1FCourse offered for
- Master Programme in Cognitive Science
Entry requirements
- Bachelor's degree in Cognitive Science equivalent to a Swedish Kandidatexamen
or - Bachelor's degree in Computer Science or equivalent
- 30 ECTS credits passed in one of the following subjects:
- Psychology
- Linguistics
- Philosophy
- Neuroscience
- Anthropology
or equivalent
or - Bachelor's degree in one of the following subject areas equivalent to a Swedish Kandidatexamen:
- Psychology
- Neuroscience - 30 ECTS credits passed in Computer Science or equivalent
and - 12 ECTS credits passed in deisgn, with 6 ECTS credits passed on advanced level (for example "Interaktionsdesign och användarupplevelse 9 hp", "Avancerad interaktionsdesign 6 hp" or "Interaktionsdesign studio 6 hp") or equivalent
and - English and Swedish corresponding to the level of English and Swedish in Swedish upper secondary education (Engelska 6 and Svenska 3)
Intended learning outcomes
After completion of the course, the student shall on an advanced level be able to:
- apply basic concepts from distributed cognition,
- represent alternatives in a design space,
- reflect on the value of representations,
- use and develop tools and methods for representations, and reflect on what the tools enable and confine,
- describe and systematically reflect on how to represent complex situations on a detailed as well as holistic level.
Course content
Ability and knowledge about what the roles of representations are in design, including the ability and knowledge to use different tools to plan and use representations is developed, by conducting a series of assignments. Literature from design and cognitive science is used to reflect on the process. Emphasis is put on reflecting in- and on action to further the understanding of mechanisms for learning with the help of representations and the connection between the built representation and the knowledge it makes available. More general implications for design of placing representation at the center of the design process is also considered in the course.
Teaching and working methods
The course circles around a sequence of assignments and design work that are concluded with seminars and examination sessions. In addition, the student should conduct self-study.
Examination
The course is examined through an individuell assignment, and a group assignment. Detailed informaton can be found in the course's study guide.
If special circumstances prevail, and if it is possible with consideration of the nature of the compulsory component, the examiner may decide to replace the compulsory component with another equivalent component.
If the LiU coordinator for students with disabilities has granted a student the right to an adapted examination for a written examination in an examination hall, the student has the right to it.
If the coordinator has recommended for the student an adapted examination or alternative form of examination, the examiner may grant this if the examiner assesses that it is possible, based on consideration of the course objectives.
An examiner may also decide that an adapted examination or alternative form of examination if the examiner assessed that special circumstances prevail, and the examiner assesses that it is possible while maintaining the objectives of the course.
Students failing an exam covering either the entire course or part of the course twice are entitled to have a new examiner appointed for the reexamination.
Students who have passed an examination may not retake it in order to improve their grades.
Grades
Three-grade scale, U, G, VGOther information
Planning and implementation of a course must take its starting point in the wording of the syllabus. The course evaluation included in each course must therefore take up the question how well the course agrees with the syllabus.
The course is carried out in such a way that both men´s and women´s experience and knowledge is made visible and developed.
If special circumstances prevail, the vice-chancellor may in a special decision specify the preconditions for temporary deviations from this course syllabus, and delegate the right to take such decisions.
Department
Institutionen för datavetenskapCode | Name | Scope | Grading scale |
---|---|---|---|
UPG2 | Group Assignment | 3 credits | U, G |
UPG1 | Individual Assignment | 3 credits | U, G, VG |
Regulary literature
Articles
Additional literature
Other
Books, articles and conference papers provided by staff.
This tab contains public material from the course room in Lisam. The information published here is not legally binding, such material can be found under the other tabs on this page.
There are no files available for this course.