Student rights and obligations (login required)
Linköping University common rules and regulations (in Swedish)
Technology (31-45 cr), 15 credits
Teknik (31-45 hp), 15 hp
9ATK37
Main field of study
EngineeringCourse level
Second cycleCourse type
Programme courseExaminer
Jonas HallströmCourse coordinator
Jonas HallströmECV = Elective / Compulsory / Voluntary
Main field of study
EngineeringCourse level
Second cycleAdvancement level
A1XCourse offered for
- Secondary School Teacher Programme with a specialization in Teaching in Grades 7-9 of the Compulsory School
Examination
Applies to all courses regardless of grading scale.
- Students failing an exam covering either the entire course or part of the course two times are entitled to have a new examiner appointed for the reexamination.
If the course has a three-graded grading scale (U - VG), following applies:
- Students who have passed an examination may not retake it in order to improve their grades.
The following applies to courses that include a compulsory component:
- If special circumstances prevail, and if it is possible with consideration of the nature of the compulsory component, the examiner may decide to replace the compulsory component with another equivalent component.
If the LiU coordinator for students with disabilities has granted a student the right to an adapted examination for a written examination in an examination hall, the student has the right to it. If the coordinator has instead recommended for the student an adapted examination or alternative form of examination, the examiner may grant this if the examiner assesses that it is possible, based on consideration of the course objectives.
Grades
Three-grade scale, U, G, VGOther information
Planning and implementation of a course must take its starting point in the wording of the syllabus. The course evaluation included in each course must therefore take up the question how well the course agrees with the syllabus.
The course is carried out in such a way that both men´s and women´s experience and knowledge is made visible and developed.
Department
Institutionen för beteendevetenskap och lärande| Code | Name | Scope | Grading scale |
|---|---|---|---|
| UPS1 | Thesis | 6 credits | U, G, VG |
| SRE1 | Written presentation | 4.5 credits | U, G, VG |
| RESP | Respondent | 0 credits | U, G |
| OPPO | Opponent | 0 credits | U, G |
| MRE2 | Oral presentation | 1.5 credits | U, G, VG |
| MRE1 | Oral presentation | 1.5 credits | U, G, VG |
| MRE4 | Exercises | 1.5 credits | U, G, VG |
Anshelm, Jonas. 2006. Bergsäkert eller våghalsigt? Frågan om kärnavfallets hantering i det offentliga samtalet i Sverige 1950-2002. Lund: Arkiv.
Blomkvist, Pär & Arne Kaijser. 1998. Den konstruerade världen. Tekniska system i historiskt perspektiv. Stockholm/Stehag: Symposion.
Bryman, Alan. 2002. Samhällsvetenskapliga metoder. Malmö: Liber ekonomi.
Gyberg, Per & Hallström, Jonas (red.) Världens gång - Teknikens utveckling. Lund: Studentlitteratur, del II Teknik som system.
Hartman, Sven. 2003. Skrivhandledning för examensarbeten och rapporter. Stockholm: Natur & kultur.
Hughes, Thomas. 1987. “The Evolution of Large Technological Systems.” I The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology, W.E. Bijker, T.P. Hughes och T.J. Pinch (red.). London: MIT Press.
Johansson, Birgitta. 2004. Stadens tekniska system. Naturresurser i kretslopp. Stockholm: Formas.
Kaijser, Arne. 2004. ”The Dynamics of Infrasystems: Lessons from History”, Proceedings of the Summer Academy 2004 "Urban Infrastructure in Transition: What can we learn from history", http://www.ifz.tugraz.at/index_en.php/article/articleview/658/1/30/
Klasander, Claes. 2006. ”Innehållsaspekter av systemperspektiv i teknikundervisning. En studie av sex olika nationers styrdokument”, Forskningskonferens i teknikdidaktik. Styrdokument och klassrumsverklighet i skolans teknikundervisning, Norrköping 20–21 mars, 2006, http://www.ep.liu.se/ecp/017/004/
Svensson, Maria. 2009. ”Från föremål till system – mot en undervisningsstrategi i grundskolan.” I På spaning efter teknisk bildning, Å Ingerman, K. Wagner & A.-S. Axelsson (red.). Stockholm: Liber.
Örtnäs, Anna. 2007. ”Elevers vardagsuppfattningar om tekniska system”. Examensarbete. Linköping: IBL/Electronic Press, Linköpings universitet, http://www.ep.liu.se/abstract.xsql?dbid=8838
This tab contains public material from the course room in Lisam. The information published here is not legally binding, such material can be found under the other tabs on this page.
There are no files available for this course.