Technology (31-45 cr), 15 credits

Teknik (31-45 hp), 15 hp


The course is disused. Offered for the last time Spring semester 2021. Replaced by 93TK39.

Main field of study


Course level

Second cycle

Course type

Programme course


Jonas Hallström

Course coordinator

Johan Svenningsson

Director of studies or equivalent

Mats Brusman

Main field of study


Course level

Second cycle

Advancement level


Course offered for

  • Secondary School Teacher Programme with a specialization in Teaching in Grades 7-9 of the Compulsory School


Applies to all courses regardless of grading scale.

  • Students failing an exam covering either the entire course or part of the course two times are entitled to have a new examiner appointed for the reexamination.

If the course has a three-graded grading scale (U - VG), following applies:

  • Students who have passed an examination may not retake it in order to improve their grades.

The following applies to courses that include a compulsory component:

  • If special circumstances prevail, and if it is possible with consideration of the nature of the compulsory component, the examiner may decide to replace the compulsory component with another equivalent component.

If the LiU coordinator for students with disabilities has granted a student the right to an adapted examination for a written examination in an examination hall, the student has the right to it. If the coordinator has instead recommended for the student an adapted examination or alternative form of examination, the examiner may grant this if the examiner assesses that it is possible, based on consideration of the course objectives.


Three-grade scale, U, G, VG

Other information

Course revised 2020-04-02; Dnr LiU-2020-01361

Planning and implementation of a course must take its starting point in the wording of the syllabus. The course evaluation included in each course must therefore take up the question how well the course agrees with the syllabus.

The course is carried out in such a way that both men´s and women´s experience and knowledge is made visible and developed.

About teaching and examination language

The teaching language is presented in the Overview tab for each course. The examination language relates to the teaching language as follows: 

If teaching language is Swedish, the course as a whole or in large parts, is taught in Swedish. Please note that although teaching language is Swedish, parts of the course could be given in English. Examination language is Swedish. 

If teaching language is Swedish/English, the course as a whole will be taught in English if students without prior knowledge of the Swedish language participate. Examination language is Swedish or English (depending on teaching language). 

If teaching language is English, the course as a whole is taught in English. Examination language is English. 


Institutionen för beteendevetenskap och lärande
Code Name Scope Grading scale
UPS1 Thesis 6 credits U, G, VG
SRE1 Written presentation 4.5 credits U, G, VG
RESP Respondent 0 credits U, G
OPPO Opponent 0 credits U, G
MRE2 Oral presentation 1.5 credits U, G, VG
MRE1 Oral presentation 1.5 credits U, G, VG
MRE4 Exercises 1.5 credits U, G, VG
Anshelm, Jonas. 2006. Bergsäkert eller våghalsigt? Frågan om kärnavfallets hantering i det offentliga samtalet i Sverige 1950-2002. Lund: Arkiv. Blomkvist, Pär & Arne Kaijser. 1998. Den konstruerade världen. Tekniska system i historiskt perspektiv. Stockholm/Stehag: Symposion. Bryman, Alan. 2002. Samhällsvetenskapliga metoder. Malmö: Liber ekonomi. Gyberg, Per & Hallström, Jonas (red.) Världens gång - Teknikens utveckling. Lund: Studentlitteratur, del II Teknik som system. Hartman, Sven. 2003. Skrivhandledning för examensarbeten och rapporter. Stockholm: Natur & kultur. Hughes, Thomas. 1987. “The Evolution of Large Technological Systems.” I The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology, W.E. Bijker, T.P. Hughes och T.J. Pinch (red.). London: MIT Press. Johansson, Birgitta. 2004. Stadens tekniska system. Naturresurser i kretslopp. Stockholm: Formas. Kaijser, Arne. 2004. ”The Dynamics of Infrasystems: Lessons from History”, Proceedings of the Summer Academy 2004 "Urban Infrastructure in Transition: What can we learn from history", Klasander, Claes. 2006. ”Innehållsaspekter av systemperspektiv i teknikundervisning. En studie av sex olika nationers styrdokument”, Forskningskonferens i teknikdidaktik. Styrdokument och klassrumsverklighet i skolans teknikundervisning, Norrköping 20–21 mars, 2006, Svensson, Maria. 2009. ”Från föremål till system – mot en undervisningsstrategi i grundskolan.” I På spaning efter teknisk bildning, Å Ingerman, K. Wagner & A.-S. Axelsson (red.). Stockholm: Liber. Örtnäs, Anna. 2007. ”Elevers vardagsuppfattningar om tekniska system”. Examensarbete. Linköping: IBL/Electronic Press, Linköpings universitet,

This tab contains public material from the course room in Lisam. The information published here is not legally binding, such material can be found under the other tabs on this page.

There are no files available for this course.