Student rights and obligations (login required)
Linköping University common rules and regulations (in Swedish)
Assessment and grading, 7.5 credits
Bedömning och betygssättning, 7.5 hp
976G05
Main field of study
DidacticsCourse level
First cycleCourse type
Programme courseExaminer
Sol MorénCourse coordinator
Sol MorénDirector of studies or equivalent
Martin LundbergECV = Elective / Compulsory / Voluntary
| Course offered for | Semester | Weeks | Language | Campus | ECV | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L1YRK | Programme for Vocational Teacher Education | 4 (Spring 2022) | 202204-202213 | Swedish | Linköping, Valla | C |
| L7VA2 | VAL II - Professional Qualification Course for Teachers | 1 (Spring 2022) | 202204-202213 | Swedish | Linköping, Valla | E |
| L7VA2 | VAL II - Professional Qualification Course for Teachers | 2 (Spring 2022) | 202204-202213 | Swedish | Linköping, Valla | E |
| L7VA2 | VAL II - Professional Qualification Course for Teachers | 3 (Spring 2022) | 202204-202213 | Swedish | Linköping, Valla | E |
| L7VA2 | VAL II - Professional Qualification Course for Teachers | 4 (Spring 2022) | 202204-202213 | Swedish | Linköping, Valla | E |
| L7VA2 | VAL II - Professional Qualification Course for Teachers | 5 (Spring 2022) | 202204-202213 | Swedish | Linköping, Valla | E |
| L7VA2 | VAL II - Professional Qualification Course for Teachers | 6 (Spring 2022) | 202204-202213 | Swedish | Linköping, Valla | E |
| L7VA2 | VAL II - Professional Qualification Course for Teachers | 7 (Spring 2022) | 202204-202213 | Swedish | Linköping, Valla | E |
Main field of study
DidacticsCourse level
First cycleAdvancement level
G1XCourse offered for
- VAL II - Professional Qualification Course for Teachers
- Programme for Vocational Teacher Education
Examination
Students failing an exam covering either the entire course or part of the course two times are entitled to have a new examiner appointed for the reexamination.
Applies to all courses regardless of grading scale.
- Students failing an exam covering either the entire course or part of the course two times are entitled to have a new examiner appointed for the reexamination.
If the course has a three-graded grading scale (U - VG), following applies:
- Students who have passed an examination may not retake it in order to improve their grades.
The following applies to courses that include a compulsory component:
- If special circumstances prevail, and if it is possible with consideration of the nature of the compulsory component, the examiner may decide to replace the compulsory component with another equivalent component.
If the LiU coordinator for students with disabilities has granted a student the right to an adapted examination for a written examination in an examination hall, the student has the right to it.
If the coordinator has recommended for the student an adapted examination or alternative form of examination, the examiner may grant this if the examiner assesses that it is possible, based on consideration of the course objectives.
An examiner may also decide that an adapted examination or alternative form of examination if the examiner assessed that special circumstances prevail, and the examiner assesses that it is possible while maintaining the objectives of the course.
Grades
Three-grade scale, U, G, VGOther information
Course revised 2020-04-02; Dnr LiU-2020-01361Planning and implementation of a course must take its starting point in the wording of the syllabus. The course evaluation included in each course must therefore take up the question how well the course agrees with the syllabus.
The course is carried out in such a way that both men´s and women´s experience and knowledge is made visible and developed.
If special circumstances prevail, the vice-chancellor may in a special decision specify the preconditions for temporary deviations from this course syllabus, and delegate the right to take such decisions.
About teaching and examination language
The teaching language is presented in the Overview tab for each course. The examination language relates to the teaching language as follows:
- If teaching language is Swedish, the course as a whole or in large parts, is taught in Swedish. Please note that although teaching language is Swedish, parts of the course could be given in English. Examination language is Swedish.
- If teaching language is Swedish/English, the course as a whole will be taught in English if students without prior knowledge of the Swedish language participate. Examination language is Swedish or English (depending on teaching language).
- If teaching language is English, the course as a whole is taught in English. Examination language is English.
Department
Institutionen för beteendevetenskap och lärande| Code | Name | Scope | Grading scale |
|---|---|---|---|
| STN1 | Written exam | 1.5 credits | U, G |
| SRE1 | Written presentation | 6 credits | U, G, VG |
Course literature is preliminary.
Books
Aldenmyr Irisdotter, S. & Paulin, A. & Zetterqvist, K, (2016) Etik i professionellt lärarskap 2 uppl. Polen: Gleerups
ISBN: 9789140694751
Andersson, P, (2014) Lära till yrkeslärare Lund: Studentlitteratur
Andersson, Per & Fejes, Andreas, (2010) Kunskapers värde: Validering i teori och praktik andra upplagan Lund: Studentlitteratur
Fejes, A. Lindberg, V. & Wärvik, G-B, (2017) Yrkesdidaktikens mångfald Stockholm: Lärarförlaget.
Köpsén, S, (2019) Lära till Yrkeslärare Lund: Studentlitteratur
Korp, H, (2011) Kunskapsbedömning: vad, hur och varför? Stockholm: Skolverket
Lindström, L. Lindberg, V. & Pettersson, A (red.), (2011) Pedagogisk bedömning: att dokumentera, bedöma och utveckla kunskap Andra upplagan Stockholm: Stockholms universitets förlag
Lundgren, U-P, & Säljö, R. med flera, (2017) Lärande, skola, bildning. Grundbok för lärare
Nordgren, Kenneth, Odenstad, Christina & Samuelsson, Johan (red.), (2016) Betyg i teori och praktik: Ämnesdidaktiska perspektiv på bedömning i grundskola och gymnasium Andra upplagan Malmö: Gleerups
Tsagalidis, Helena, (2008) Därför fick jag bara godkänt – Bedömning i karaktärsämnen på HR-programmet.
Wikström, C, (2013) Konsten att göra bra prov - vad lärare behöver veta om kunskapsmätning Stockholm: Natur och Kultur
Articles
Allen, James D, Grades as valid measures of academic achievement of classroom learning The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas 2005
Black, Paul & Wiliam, Dylan, Developing the theory of formative assessment Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability 2009
Hattie, John & Timperley, Hellen, The power of feedback Review of Educational Research 2007
Hirsh, Å, Dokumentation i enlighet med lärares pedagogiska uppdrag och juridiska skyldigheter Stockholm: Skolverket. 2018
Hirsh, Å, Effektiva former för dokumentation i enlighet med regelverk och forskning om lärande Stockholm: Skolverket 2018
Hofvendahl, Johan, Relata refero: “positiv, pigg och bra attityd” Studies in Educational Policy and Educational Philosophy, E-tidskrift 2004: 2. [13]
Lindh, Gunnel & Lindh-Munther, Agneta, ). ”Antingen får man skäll eller beröm”. En studie av utvecklingssamtal i elevers perspektiv Studies in Educational Policy and Educational philosophy: E-tidskrift, 2005:1. [25] 2005
Skolverket, Utvecklingssamtalet och den skriftliga individuella utvecklingsplanen 2013
Tsagalidis, H, Yrkeslärarens frågandepraktik – kunskap och bedömning 2012
http://home.hit.no/~aakre/nordyrk/2012/2012-3-tsagalidis.pdf
This tab contains public material from the course room in Lisam. The information published here is not legally binding, such material can be found under the other tabs on this page.
There are no files available for this course.