Student rights and obligations (login required)
Linköping University common rules and regulations (in Swedish)
Mathematics: Mathematics Education 1, 5.5 credits
Matematik: Matematikdidaktik 1, 5.5 hp
92MA16
Main field of study
MathematicsCourse level
First cycleCourse type
Programme courseExaminer
Peter FrejdCourse coordinator
Peter FrejdDirector of studies or equivalent
Mikael LangerECV = Elective / Compulsory / Voluntary
Main field of study
MathematicsCourse level
First cycleAdvancement level
GXXCourse offered for
- Secondary School Teacher Programme with a specialization in Teaching in Grades 7-9 of the Compulsory School
- Secondary School Teacher Programme with a specialization in Teaching in the Upper-Secondary School
Grades
Three-grade scale, U, G, VGDepartment
Matematiska institutionenCode | Name | Scope | Grading scale |
---|---|---|---|
MRE1 | Examination | 1 credits | U, G |
SRE2 | Examination | 1.5 credits | U, G, VG |
SRE1 | Examination | 3 credits | U, G |
Course literature is preliminary.
Bergsten, C. m. fl (1997). Algebra för alla. Nämnaren Tema.
Göteborg: NCM
Brandell, G., & Pettersson, A. (Red.). (2011)
Matematikundervisning. Vetenskapliga perspektiv. Stockholm:
Stockholms universitets förlag
Gustafsson, L. & Mouwitz, L. (2002). Vuxna och matematik - ett
livsviktigt ämne. Göteborg: NCM.
Jablonka, E. (2009). Mathematics for all: why? what? when? In C.
Winsløw (Ed.), Nordic research in mathematics education.
Proceedings from NORMA08 in Copenhagen, April 21 - April 25,
2008. (pp. 293-306). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
James, M. C., & Willoughby, S. (2011). Listening to student
conversations during clicker questions: What you have not heard
might surprise you! American Journal of Physics, 79(1), 123.
Niss, M. (1994). Mathematics in society. In R. Biehler et al. (Eds.),
Didactics of mathematics as a scientific discipline (pp. 367-378).
Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Skolverkets kursplaner och betygskriterier i matematik.
Smith, M. K., Wood, W. B., Adams, W. K., Wieman, C., Knight, J.
K., Guild, N., & Su, T. T. (2009). Why peer discussion improves
student performance on in‐class concept questions. Science,
323(5910), 122–4.
Wieman, C. et al. (2009). Clicker Resource Guide: An Instructor’s
Guide to the Effective Use of Personal Response Systems
(Clickers) in Teaching.
This tab contains public material from the course room in Lisam. The information published here is not legally binding, such material can be found under the other tabs on this page.
There are no files available for this course.